1. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
  2. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
  3. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
  4. Mapping distinct phase transitions to a neural network, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (5) 053306, (2020), arXiv:2007.00355 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.053306
  5. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
  6. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
  7. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
  8. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
  9. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton, Commun. ACM 60 (6) 84–90, (2017), doi:10.1145/3065386
  10. Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, Phys. Rev. B 96 (18) 184410, (2017), arXiv:1705.05582 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410
  11. Sampling of General Correlators in Worm Algorithm-based Simulations, Tobias Rindlisbacher, Oskar \rAkerlund, and Philippe de Forcrand, Nucl. Phys. B 909 542–583, (2016), arXiv:1602.09017 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.05.026
  12. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge, Olga Russakovsky, and others, Int. J. Comput. Vision 115 (3) 211–252, (2015), arXiv:1409.0575 doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
  13. Spectroscopy in finite density lattice field theory: An exploratory study in the relativistic Bose gas, Christof Gattringer, and Thomas Kloiber, Phys. Lett. B 720 210–214, (2013), arXiv:1212.3770 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.068
  14. Lattice study of the Silver Blaze phenomenon for a charged scalar $\phi^4$ field, Christof Gattringer, and Thomas Kloiber, Nucl. Phys. B 869 56–73, (2013), arXiv:1206.2954 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.12.005
  15. Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density, Thomas D . Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 222001, (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307089 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.222001
  16. Worm Algorithms for Classical Statistical Models, Nikolay Prokof'ev, and Boris Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 160601, (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0103146 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160601
  17. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, (1998), doi:10.1109/5.726791
  18. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, G. Cybenko, Math. Control Signals Syst. 2 (4) 303–314, (1989), doi:10.1007/BF02551274
  19. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position, Kunihiko Fukushima, Biol. Cyber. 36 (4) 193–202, (1980), doi:10.1007/BF00344251