1. **HMC and gradient flow with machine\-learned classically perfect fixed point actions**, Urs Wenger, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, and David I\. Müller, *PoS* **LATTICE2024** 466 (2025) [arXiv:2502.03315](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03315) [doi:10.22323/1.466.0466](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.466.0466)

2. **Flow\-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects**, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A\. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **134** (15) 151601 (2025) [arXiv:2410.14466](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14466) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601)

3. **Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **112** (9) 094516 (2025) [arXiv:2410.13161](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13161) [doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6](https://doi.org/10.1103/31d5-hvp6)

4. **Sampling SU\(3\) pure gauge theory with Stochastic Normalizing Flows**, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, *PoS* **LATTICE2024** 040 (2025) [arXiv:2409.18861](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18861) [doi:10.22323/1.466.0040](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.466.0040)

5. **Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, *JHEP* **02** 090 (2025) [arXiv:2409.15937](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15937) [doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090)

6. **Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles**, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **109** (9) 094514 (2024) [arXiv:2401.10874](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10874) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514)

7. **Machine learning a fixed point action for SU\(3\) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network**, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I\. Müller, and Urs Wenger, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **110** (7) 074502 (2024) [arXiv:2401.06481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502)

8. **Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space\-time dimension**, Ryan Abbott, and others (2023) [arXiv:2305.02402](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02402)

9. **Gauge\-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD**, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **110** (3) 034517 (2024) [arXiv:2304.10438](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10438) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517)

10. **Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks**, Jimmy Aronsson, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh (2023) [arXiv:2303.11448](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11448)

11. **Gauge\-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD**, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (3) 034503 (2023) [arXiv:2302.05419](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05419) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503)

12. **Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories**, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) L051504 (2023) [arXiv:2212.08469](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08469) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504)

13. **Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow\-based sampling of lattice QCD**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **59** (11) 257 (2023) [arXiv:2211.07541](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07541) [doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w)

14. **Neural\-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theory**, Salvatore Cal\\\`\\i, Daniel C\. Hackett, Yin Lin, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Brian Xiao, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (3) 034508 (2023) [arXiv:2208.02728](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02728) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508)

15. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

16. **Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *SciPost Phys\.* **15** (6) 238 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00283](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00283) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238)

17. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

18. **Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows**, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan (2021) [arXiv:2110.02673](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02673)

19. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

20. **Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges**, Michael M\. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Taco Cohen, and Petar Veli\\vckovi\\'c (2021) [arXiv:2104.13478](https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478)

21. **Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2101.08176](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08176)

22. **Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks**, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (3) 032003 (2022) [arXiv:2012.12901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12901) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003)

23. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo for non\-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions**, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 054501 (2023) [arXiv:2010.11900](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11900) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501)

24. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

25. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

26. **Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer (2020) [arXiv:2002.02428](https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02428)

27. **Classifying topological charge in SU\(3\) Yang\{\\textendash\}Mills theory with machine learning**, Takuya Matsumoto, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and Yasuhiro Kohno, *PTEP* **2021** (2) 023D01 (2021) [arXiv:1909.06238](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06238) [doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa138](https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa138)

28. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

29. **FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group \(FLAG\)**, S\. Aoki, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. C* **80** (2) 113 (2020) [arXiv:1902.08191](https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08191) [doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7)

30. **Review of Lattice QCD Studies of Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Contribution to Muon $g−2$**, Kohtaroh Miura, *PoS* **LATTICE2018** 010 (2019) [arXiv:1901.09052](https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09052) [doi:10.22323/1.334.0010](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.334.0010)

31. **Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Mach\. Learn\. Sci\. Tech\.* **1** 045011 (2020) [arXiv:1811.03533](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03533) [doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73](https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abae73)

32. **Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory**, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (1) 011501 (2019) [arXiv:1810.12879](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12879) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501)

33. **Neural Ordinary Differential Equations**, Ricky T\. Q\. Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud (2018) [arXiv:1806.07366](https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07366)

34. **Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning**, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya (2017) [arXiv:1712.03893](https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03893)

35. **Evidence of effective axial U\(1\) symmetry restoration at high temperature QCD**, A\. Tomiya, G\. Cossu, S\. Aoki, H\. Fukaya, S\. Hashimoto, T\. Kaneko, and J\. Noaki, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **96** (3) 034509 (2017) [arXiv:1612.01908](https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01908) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034509)

36. **Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks**, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun (2016) [arXiv:1603.05027](https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.05027)

37. **Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition**, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun (2015) [arXiv:1512.03385](https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385) [doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90](https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90)

38. **Thermodynamics of strong\-interaction matter from Lattice QCD**, Heng\-Tong Ding, Frithjof Karsch, and Swagato Mukherjee, *Int\. J\. Mod\. Phys\. E* **24** (10) 1530007 (2015) [arXiv:1504.05274](https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05274) [doi:10.1142/S0218301315300076](https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301315300076)

39. **Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing**, Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B\. Shah, *SIAM Rev\.* **59** (1) 65–98 (2017) [arXiv:1411.1607](https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1607) [doi:10.1137/141000671](https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671)

40. **Overlap/Domain\-wall reweighting**, H\. Fukaya, S\. Aoki, G\. Cossu, S\. Hashimoto, T\. Kaneko, and J\. Noaki, *PoS* **LATTICE2013** 127 (2014) [arXiv:1311.4646](https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.4646) [doi:10.22323/1.187.0127](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.187.0127)

41. **Chiral symmetry and the Yang\-\-Mills gradient flow**, Martin Luscher, *JHEP* **04** 123 (2013) [arXiv:1302.5246](https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.5246) [doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)123](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)123)

42. **Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD**, Martin Lüscher, *JHEP* **08** 071 (2010) [arXiv:1006.4518](https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4518) [doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071)

43. **Scaling studies of QCD with the dynamical HISQ action**, A\. Bazavov, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **82** 074501 (2010) [arXiv:1004.0342](https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.0342) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074501)

44. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

45. **Hypercubic smeared links for dynamical fermions**, Anna Hasenfratz, Roland Hoffmann, and Stefan Schaefer, *JHEP* **05** 029 (2007) [arXiv:hep-lat/0702028](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0702028) [doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/029](https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/029)

46. **The Rational Hybrid Monte Carlo Algorithm**, M\. A\. Clark, *PoS* **LAT2006** 004 (2006) [arXiv:hep-lat/0610048](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0610048) [doi:10.22323/1.032.0004](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.032.0004)

47. **Highly improved staggered quarks on the lattice, with applications to charm physics**, E\. Follana, Q\. Mason, C\. Davies, K\. Hornbostel, G\. P\. Lepage, J\. Shigemitsu, H\. Trottier, and K\. Wong, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **75** 054502 (2007) [arXiv:hep-lat/0610092](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0610092) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.054502](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.054502)

48. **Rationale for UV\-filtered clover fermions**, Stefano Capitani, Stephan Durr, and Christian Hoelbling, *JHEP* **11** 028 (2006) [arXiv:hep-lat/0607006](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0607006) [doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/028](https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/028)

49. **Hybrid Monte Carlo with fat link fermion actions**, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B\. Leinweber, and Anthony G\. Williams, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **70** 014502 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0403019](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0403019) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.014502](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.014502)

50. **Analytic smearing of SU\(3\) link variables in lattice QCD**, Colin Morningstar, and Mike J\. Peardon, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **69** 054501 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0311018](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0311018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.054501)

51. **Variants of fattening and flavor symmetry restoration**, Kostas Orginos, Doug Toussaint, and R\. L\. Sugar, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **60** 054503 (1999) [arXiv:hep-lat/9903032](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9903032) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.054503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.054503)

52. **Improving flavor symmetry in the Kogut\-Susskind hadron spectrum**, Tom Blum, Carleton E\. Detar, Steven A\. Gottlieb, Kari Rummukainen, Urs M\. Heller, James E\. Hetrick, Doug Toussaint, R\. L\. Sugar, and Matthew Wingate, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **55** R1133–R1137 (1997) [arXiv:hep-lat/9609036](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9609036) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.R1133](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.R1133)

53. **Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function**, G\. Cybenko, *Math\. Control Signals Syst\.* **2** (4) 303–314 (1989) [doi:10.1007/BF02551274](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551274)

54. **Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD**, M\. Albanese, and others, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **192** 163–169 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91160-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91160-9)

55. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)