1. HMC and gradient flow with machine-learned classically perfect fixed point actions, Urs Wenger, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, PoS LATTICE2024 466, (2025), arXiv:2502.03315 doi:10.22323/1.466.0466
2. Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (15) 151601, (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601
3. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
4. Sampling SU(3) pure gauge theory with Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 040, (2025), arXiv:2409.18861 doi:10.22323/1.466.0040
5. Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 090, (2025), arXiv:2409.15937 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090
6. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
7. Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) 074502, (2024), arXiv:2401.06481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502
8. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
9. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
10. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
11. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
12. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
13. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
14. Neural-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theory, Salvatore Cal\`\i, Daniel C. Hackett, Yin Lin, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Brian Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034508, (2023), arXiv:2208.02728 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508
15. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
16. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
17. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
18. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
19. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
20. Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges, Michael M. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Taco Cohen, and Petar Veli\vckovi\'c, (2021), arXiv:2104.13478
21. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
22. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
23. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
24. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
25. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
26. Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer, (2020), arXiv:2002.02428
27. Classifying topological charge in SU(3) Yang{\textendash}Mills theory with machine learning, Takuya Matsumoto, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and Yasuhiro Kohno, PTEP 2021 (2) 023D01, (2021), arXiv:1909.06238 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa138
28. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
29. FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), S. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) 113, (2020), arXiv:1902.08191 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7
30. Review of Lattice QCD Studies of Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Contribution to Muon $g−2$, Kohtaroh Miura, PoS LATTICE2018 010, (2019), arXiv:1901.09052 doi:10.22323/1.334.0010
31. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
32. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
33. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud, (2018), arXiv:1806.07366
34. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
35. Evidence of effective axial U(1) symmetry restoration at high temperature QCD, A. Tomiya, G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) 034509, (2017), arXiv:1612.01908 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034509
36. Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun, (2016), arXiv:1603.05027
37. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun, (2015), arXiv:1512.03385 doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
38. Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD, Heng-Tong Ding, Frithjof Karsch, and Swagato Mukherjee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24 (10) 1530007, (2015), arXiv:1504.05274 doi:10.1142/S0218301315300076
39. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing, Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B. Shah, SIAM Rev. 59 (1) 65–98, (2017), arXiv:1411.1607 doi:10.1137/141000671
40. Overlap/Domain-wall reweighting, H. Fukaya, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki, PoS LATTICE2013 127, (2014), arXiv:1311.4646 doi:10.22323/1.187.0127
41. Chiral symmetry and the Yang--Mills gradient flow, Martin Luscher, JHEP 04 123, (2013), arXiv:1302.5246 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)123
42. Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, Martin Lüscher, JHEP 08 071, (2010), arXiv:1006.4518 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071
43. Scaling studies of QCD with the dynamical HISQ action, A. Bazavov, and others, Phys. Rev. D 82 074501, (2010), arXiv:1004.0342 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074501
44. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
45. Hypercubic smeared links for dynamical fermions, Anna Hasenfratz, Roland Hoffmann, and Stefan Schaefer, JHEP 05 029, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0702028 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/029
46. The Rational Hybrid Monte Carlo Algorithm, M. A. Clark, PoS LAT2006 004, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0610048 doi:10.22323/1.032.0004
47. Highly improved staggered quarks on the lattice, with applications to charm physics, E. Follana, Q. Mason, C. Davies, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, H. Trottier, and K. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 75 054502, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0610092 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.054502
48. Rationale for UV-filtered clover fermions, Stefano Capitani, Stephan Durr, and Christian Hoelbling, JHEP 11 028, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0607006 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/028
49. Hybrid Monte Carlo with fat link fermion actions, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber, and Anthony G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 70 014502, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0403019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.014502
50. Analytic smearing of SU(3) link variables in lattice QCD, Colin Morningstar, and Mike J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D 69 054501, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0311018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.054501
51. Variants of fattening and flavor symmetry restoration, Kostas Orginos, Doug Toussaint, and R. L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. D 60 054503, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9903032 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.054503
52. Improving flavor symmetry in the Kogut-Susskind hadron spectrum, Tom Blum, Carleton E. Detar, Steven A. Gottlieb, Kari Rummukainen, Urs M. Heller, James E. Hetrick, Doug Toussaint, R. L. Sugar, and Matthew Wingate, Phys. Rev. D 55 R1133–R1137, (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9609036 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.R1133
53. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, G. Cybenko, Math. Control Signals Syst. 2 (4) 303–314, (1989), doi:10.1007/BF02551274
54. Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD, M. Albanese, and others, Phys. Lett. B 192 163–169, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91160-9
55. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X