1. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
2. Neural network interpolators for Wilson loops, Julian Mayer-Steudte, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.07226
3. Parameter Optimization of Domain-Wall Fermion using Machine Learning, Shunsuke Yasunaga, Kenta Yoshimura, Akio Tomiya, and Yuki Nagai, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.16329
4. Variance reduction in lattice QCD observables via normalizing flows, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Yang Fu, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, (2026), arXiv:2603.02984
5. A Machine Learning Approach for Lattice Gauge Fixing, Ho Hsiao, Benjamin J. Choi, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2602.23731
6. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
7. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
8. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
9. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
10. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
11. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
12. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
13. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
14. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
15. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
16. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
17. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
18. Sampling SU(3) pure gauge theory with Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 040, (2025), arXiv:2409.18861 doi:10.22323/1.466.0040
19. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
20. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
21. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
22. Application of the path optimization method to a discrete spin system, Kouji Kashiwa, Yusuke Namekawa, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 108 (9) 094504, (2023), arXiv:2309.06018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094504
23. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
24. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
25. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
26. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
27. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
28. Exploration of Efficient Neural Network for Path Optimization Method, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, PoS LATTICE2022 026, (2023), doi:10.22323/1.430.0026
29. Hadrons, Quark-Gluon Plasma, and Neutron Stars, Akira Ohnishi, Handbook of Nuclear Physics 1–58, (2023), doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_27-1
30. Neural Network Gauge Field Transformation for 4D SU(3) gauge fields, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2023 040, (2023), arXiv:2405.19692
31. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
32. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
33. Improving efficiency of the path optimization method for a gauge theory, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034509, (2023), arXiv:2210.05402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034509
34. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
35. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
36. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
37. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
38. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
39. Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2021 600, (2022), arXiv:2201.01862 doi:10.22323/1.396.0600
40. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
41. Backpropagating Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for fast Lefschetz thimble calculations, Genki Fujisawa, Jun Nishimura, Katsuta Sakai, and Atis Yosprakob, JHEP 04 179, (2022), arXiv:2112.10519 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)179
42. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
43. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
44. Gauge invariant input to neural network for path optimization method, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 105 (3) 034502, (2022), arXiv:2109.11710 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034502
45. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
46. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
47. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418