1. Normalizing-flow-based density of states for (1+1)D U(1) lattice gauge theory with a $θ$-term, Simran Singh, and Lena Funcke, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.12501
  2. A novel gauge-equivariant neural-network architecture for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Simon Pfahler, Daniel Knüttel, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2602.23840 doi:10.22323/1.518.0027
  3. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
  4. Neural Field Transformations for Hybrid Monte Carlo: Architectural Design and Scaling, Jinchen He, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Yong Zhao, 39th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Includes Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (ML4PS), (2025), arXiv:2511.02018
  5. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
  6. Neural Triangular Transport Maps: A New Approach Towards Sampling in Lattice QCD, Andrey Bryutkin, and Youssef Marzouk, (2025), arXiv:2510.13112
  7. Application of Neural Networks for Calculating Functional Integrals in Quantum Field Theory, A. V. Vasiliev, A. S. Ivanov, D. V. Salnikov, and V. V. Chistiakov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 56 (3) 704–708, (2025), doi:10.1134/S1063779624702162
  8. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
  9. Stochastic automatic differentiation and the signal to noise problem, Guilherme Catumba, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (9) 1037, (2025), arXiv:2502.15570 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14690-0
  10. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
  11. Exploring Generative Networks for Manifolds with Non-Trivial Topology, Shi-Yang Chen, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, PoS LATTICE2024 042, (2025), arXiv:2502.02127 doi:10.22323/1.466.0042
  12. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
  13. Normalizing flows for SU(N) gauge theories employing singular value decomposition, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2024 050, (2025), arXiv:2501.18288 doi:10.22323/1.466.0050
  14. Normalizing flow-assisted nested sampling on Type-II Seesaw model, Rajneil Baruah, Subhadeep Mondal, Sunando Kumar Patra, and Satyajit Roy, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (7) 816, (2025), arXiv:2501.16432 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14502-5
  15. Novel Techniques for Global Analysis of Parton Distribution Functions, Nicholas Timothy Hunt-Smith, (2025)
  16. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
  17. Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, Postponed: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences}: {Workshop at NeurIPS 2024, (2024), arXiv:2410.19602
  18. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
  19. Machine Learning for Path Deformation and Bayesian Data Analysis in Selected Lattice Field Theories, Marcel Rodekamp, (2024)
  20. Future trends in lattice QCD simulations, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS EuroPLEx2023 009, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.451.0009
  21. Normalizing Flows for Lattice Gauge Theories: Towards Finite Temperature Simulations, Christopher Kirwan, and Sin\'ead M. Ryan, PoS LATTICE2023 134, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0134
  22. Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2023 022, (2024), arXiv:2402.12176 doi:10.22323/1.453.0022
  23. A comparative lattice analysis of $SU(2)$ dark glueballs, Min-Huan Chu, Jun-Hui Lai, Wei Wang, Jialu Zhang, and Qianteng Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (8), (2024), arXiv:2402.03959 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad4e24
  24. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
  25. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
  26. Stochastic Approaches and the Physics of Ultracold Fermions: From Lattice Simulations to Machine Learning, Marc Bauer, (2024), doi:10.11588/heidok.00035711
  27. Sampling lattice field theories with score-based diffusion models, Thomas Ranner, (2024), doi:10.34726/hss.2024.118385
  28. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
  29. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
  30. Out-of-equilibrium simulations to fight topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Alessandro Nada, and Davide Vadacchino, PoS LATTICE2023 005, (2024), arXiv:2310.11979 doi:10.22323/1.453.0005
  31. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
  32. Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with diffusion models, N. T. Hunt-Smith, W. Melnitchouk, F. Ringer, N. Sato, A. W. Thomas, and M. J. White, Comput. Phys. Commun. 296 109059, (2024), arXiv:2309.01454 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.109059
  33. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
  34. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
  35. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
  36. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
  37. Mutual information of spin systems from autoregressive neural networks, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 108 (4) 044140, (2023), arXiv:2304.13412 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.044140
  38. Fluctuation without dissipation: Microcanonical Langevin Monte Carlo, Jakob Robnik, and Uro\vs Seljak, (2023), arXiv:2303.18221
  39. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
  40. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
  41. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
  42. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
  43. Learning Interpolations between Boltzmann Densities, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, (2023), arXiv:2301.07388
  44. Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 019, (2023), arXiv:2301.01504 doi:10.22323/1.430.0019
  45. Cosmology at the field level with probabilistic machine learning, Adam Rouhiainen, (2023), arXiv:2402.07694
  46. Simulating first-order phase transition with hierarchical autoregressive networks, Piotr Bia\las, Paulina Czarnota, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (5) 054127, (2023), arXiv:2212.04955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054127
  47. Clifford Fourier Transforms in (2+1)D Lattice Simulations of Soliton Propagations, Sadataka Furui, and Serge Dos Santos, PoS LATTICE2022 369, (2023), arXiv:2302.07871 doi:10.22323/1.430.0369
  48. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
  49. De-noising non-Gaussian fields in cosmology with normalizing flows, Adam Rouhiainen, and Moritz Münchmeyer, 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences, (2022), arXiv:2211.15161
  50. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
  51. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
  52. Mitigating the Hubbard Sign Problem. A Novel Application of Machine Learning, Marcel Rodekamp, and Christoph Gäntgen, PoS LATTICE2022 032, (2023), arXiv:2211.09584 doi:10.22323/1.430.0032
  53. Deformation Theory of Boltzmann Distributions, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences, (2022), arXiv:2210.13772
  54. Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, PoS LATTICE2022 005, (2023), arXiv:2210.03139 doi:10.22323/1.430.0005
  55. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
  56. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
  57. Analysis of Phonetic Soliton Propagation in Neutral Weyl Fermion-sea, Sadataka Furui, and Serge Dos Santos, (2022), arXiv:2209.11168
  58. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
  59. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
  60. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
  61. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
  62. Mitigating the Hubbard sign problem with complex-valued neural networks, Marcel Rodekamp, Evan Berkowitz, Christoph Gäntgen, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 106 (12) 125139, (2022), arXiv:2203.00390 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125139
  63. Gradient Estimators for Normalizing Flows, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Acta Phys. Polon. B 55 (3) 3–A2, (2024), arXiv:2202.01314 doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.55.3-A2
  64. Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo, Alexander G. D. G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet, (2022), arXiv:2201.13117
  65. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
  66. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
  67. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
  68. Preserving gauge invariance in neural networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09004, (2022), arXiv:2112.11239 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809004
  69. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
  70. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
  71. Analysis of autocorrelation times in neural Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (1) 015303, (2023), arXiv:2111.10189 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.015303
  72. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
  73. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
  74. Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD, S. -Y. Chen, H. -T. Ding, F. -Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. -B. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2110.13521
  75. Topological sampling through windings, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (10) 873, (2021), arXiv:2106.14234 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6
  76. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
  77. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
  78. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
  79. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501