1. Geometric Deep Learning and Equivariant Neural Networks, Jan E. Gerken, Jimmy Aronsson, Oscar Carlsson, Hampus Linander, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, and Daniel Persson, (2021), arXiv:2105.13926
2. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402
3. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
4. Progress on 3+1D Glasma simulations, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (9) 243, (2020), arXiv:2009.02044 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00241-6
5. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
6. Mapping distinct phase transitions to a neural network, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (5) 053306, (2020), arXiv:2007.00355 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.053306
7. Continuous-Mixture Autoregressive Networks Learning the Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition, Lingxiao Wang, Yin Jiang, Lianyi He, and Kai Zhou, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 (12) 120502, (2022), arXiv:2005.04857 doi:10.1088/0256-307X/39/12/120502
8. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
9. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
10. Decoding quantum field theory with machine learning, Daniel Grimmer, Irene Melgarejo-Lermas, Jos\'e Polo-G\'omez, and Eduardo Mart\'\in-Mart\'\inez, JHEP 08 031, (2023), arXiv:1910.03637 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)031
11. Covariance in Physics and Convolutional Neural Networks, Miranda C. N. Cheng, Vassilis Anagiannis, Maurice Weiler, Pim de Haan, Taco S. Cohen, and Max Welling, (2019), arXiv:1906.02481
12. Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M. Urban, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P. G. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) 096001, (2020), arXiv:1905.04305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001
13. Machine Learning Holographic Mapping by Neural Network Renormalization Group, Hong-Ye Hu, Shuo-Hui Li, Lei Wang, and Yi-Zhuang You, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2) 023369, (2020), arXiv:1903.00804 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023369
14. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
15. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
16. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
17. Implicit schemes for real-time lattice gauge theory, Andreas Ipp, and David Müller, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (11) 884, (2018), arXiv:1804.01995 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6323-x
18. Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics, Phiala E. Shanahan, Amalie Trewartha, and William Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 97 (9) 094506, (2018), arXiv:1801.05784 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094506
19. Comparison of topological charge definitions in Lattice QCD, Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Krzysztof Cichy, Arthur Dromard, Elena Garcia-Ramos, Karl Jansen, Urs Wenger, and Falk Zimmermann, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (5) 424, (2020), arXiv:1708.00696 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7984-9
20. Broken boost invariance in the Glasma via finite nuclei thickness, Andreas Ipp, and David Müller, Phys. Lett. B 771 74–79, (2017), arXiv:1703.00017 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.032
21. An exact mapping between the Variational Renormalization Group and Deep Learning, Pankaj Mehta, and David J. Schwab, (2014), arXiv:1410.3831
22. Deep learning and the renormalization group, C\'edric B\'eny, (2013), arXiv:1301.3124
23. Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, Martin Lüscher, JHEP 08 071, (2010), arXiv:1006.4518 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071
24. Highly improved lattice field strength tensor, Sundance O. Bilson-Thompson, Derek B. Leinweber, and Anthony G. Williams, Annals Phys. 304 1–21, (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0203008 doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00009-5
25. QCD forces and heavy quark bound states, Gunnar S. Bali, Phys. Rept. 343 1–136, (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0001312 doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00079-X
26. Improved staggered quark actions with reduced flavor symmetry violations for lattice QCD, J. F. Lagae, and D. K. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. D 59 014511, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9806014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014511
27. Improved lattice actions, Ferenc Niedermayer, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 53 56–68, (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9608097 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(96)00599-3
28. Improved Hamiltonian for Minkowski Yang-Mills theory, Guy D. Moore, Nucl. Phys. B 480 689–728, (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9605001 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00497-X
29. Yang-Mills theory without Mandelstam constraints, R. Loll, Nucl. Phys. B 400 126–144, (1993), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90400-J
30. Sphaleron transitions and baryon asymmetry: A Numerical real time analysis, Jan Ambjorn, T. Askgaard, H. Porter, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B 353 346–378, (1991), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90341-T
31. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, G. Cybenko, Math. Control Signals Syst. 2 (4) 303–314, (1989), doi:10.1007/BF02551274
32. The Energy Momentum Tensor for Lattice Gauge Theories, Sergio Caracciolo, Giuseppe Curci, Pietro Menotti, and Andrea Pelissetto, Annals Phys. 197 119, (1990), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(90)90203-Z
33. Renormalization group analysis of lattice theories and improved lattice action: Two-dimensional non-linear O(N) sigma model, Y. Iwasaki, Nucl. Phys. B 258 141–156, (1985), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90606-6
34. Continuum Limit and Improved Action in Lattice Theories. 1. Principles and $\varphi^4$ Theory, K. Symanzik, Nucl. Phys. B 226 187–204, (1983), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90468-6
35. The Reconstruction of Gauge Potentials From Wilson Loops, R. Giles, Phys. Rev. D 24 2160, (1981), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.2160
36. Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory, M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21 2308–2315, (1980), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308
37. Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation, Alexander M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 72 477–480, (1978), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90737-2
38. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445