1. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
2. Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories, Urs Wenger, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.12416
3. Neural network interpolators for Wilson loops, Julian Mayer-Steudte, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.07226
4. Variance reduction in lattice QCD observables via normalizing flows, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Yang Fu, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, (2026), arXiv:2603.02984
5. A novel gauge-equivariant neural-network architecture for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Simon Pfahler, Daniel Knüttel, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2602.23840 doi:10.22323/1.518.0027
6. Matter-induced plaquette terms in a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory, (2026), arXiv:2602.13192
7. Diffusion Models for SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions, H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B. -D. Sun, (2026), arXiv:2602.09045
8. Wilson loops with neural networks, Verena Bellscheidt, Nora Brambilla, Andreas S. Kronfeld, and Julian Mayer-Steudte, (2026), arXiv:2602.02436
9. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
10. Generalizable Equivariant Diffusion Models for Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, Thomas R. Ranner, Lingxiao Wang, Wei Wang, and Qianteng Zhu, (2026), arXiv:2601.19552
11. Rotation equivariant quantum graph neural networks with trainable compression encoder and entanglement-enhanced aggregation, Wenjie Liu, Bohan Du, Weiwei Liu, and Yifan Zhu, Neural Networks 198 108625, (2026), doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2026.108625
12. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
13. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
14. Reinforcement Learning Techniques for the Flavor Problem in Particle Physics, Alessio Giarnetti, and Davide Meloni, Symmetry 18 (1) 131, (2026), arXiv:2510.25495 doi:10.3390/sym18010131
15. AI for Pattern Hunter: Application in Wilson Loop of 2D Lattice Yang-Mills Theory, Zeyu Li, Guorui Zhu, Wenjie He, Bo Feng, Jiaqi Chen, Ming-xing Luo, and Gang Yang, (2025), arXiv:2510.24494
16. Yang-Mills Meets Data, Jonas Cassel, Fabio Schlindwein, Peter Albers, and Christoph Schnörr, (2025), arXiv:2510.19431
17. Renormalized dual basis for scalable simulations of 2+1D compact quantum electrodynamics, Marc Miranda-Riaza, Pierpaolo Fontana, and Alessio Celi, Phys. Rev. D 113 (7) 074518, (2026), arXiv:2510.18594 doi:10.1103/bf5k-xvw8
18. Accurate Ground States of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2+1D and 3+1D, Thomas Spriggs, Eliska Greplova, Juan Carrasquilla, and Jannes Nys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (10) 101902, (2026), arXiv:2509.12323 doi:10.1103/wsk2-qcvy
19. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
20. Solving the QCD effective kinetic theory with neural networks, Sergio Barrera Cabodevila, Aleksi Kurkela, and Florian Lindenbauer, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (11) 1304, (2025), arXiv:2506.19632 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15040-w
21. Large Language Models -- the Future of Fundamental Physics?, Caroline Heneka, Florian Nieser, Ayodele Ore, Tilman Plehn, and Daniel Schiller, SciPost Phys. 20 070, (2026), arXiv:2506.14757 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.20.3.070
22. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
23. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
24. Machine-Learned Renormalization-Group-Improved Gauge Actions and Classically Perfect Gradient Flows, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (3) 031901, (2026), arXiv:2504.15870 doi:10.1103/k41k-2pnc
25. Realizing string breaking dynamics in a Z2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Kostas Blekos, Georgios Polykratis, and Stefan Kühn, Phys. Rev. D 112 (11) 114506, (2025), arXiv:2504.13760 doi:10.1103/r6sr-dv13
26. Learning Chern Numbers of Topological Insulators with Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Longde Huang, Oleksandr Balabanov, Hampus Linander, Mats Granath, Daniel Persson, and Jan E. Gerken, (2025), arXiv:2502.15376
27. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
28. HMC and gradient flow with machine-learned classically perfect fixed point actions, Urs Wenger, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, PoS LATTICE2024 466, (2025), arXiv:2502.03315 doi:10.22323/1.466.0466
29. Physics-driven learning for inverse problems in quantum chromodynamics, Gert Aarts, Kenji Fukushima, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Andreas Ipp, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (3) 154–163, (2025), arXiv:2501.05580 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00798-x
30. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
31. Machine learning a perfect lattice action for the O(3) non-linear sigma-model, Liane Backfried, (2025), doi:10.34726/hss.2025.124787
32. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
33. Extended framework for the hybrid Monte Carlo in lattice gauge theory, Norman H. Christ, Lu-Chang Jin, Christoph Lehner, Erik Lundstrum, and Nobuyuki Matsumoto, Phys. Rev. D 112 (3) 034507, (2025), arXiv:2412.19904 doi:10.1103/k6dm-lj56
34. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
35. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
36. Optimal Symmetries in Binary Classification, Vishal S. Ngairangbam, and Michael Spannowsky, (2024), arXiv:2408.08823
37. Machine Learning for Path Deformation and Bayesian Data Analysis in Selected Lattice Field Theories, Marcel Rodekamp, (2024)
38. Study of the mass of pseudoscalar glueball with a deep neural network, Lin Gao, (2024), arXiv:2407.12010
39. Approximately Symmetric Neural Networks for Quantum Spin Liquids, Dominik S. Kufel, Jack Kemp, DinhDuy Vu, Simon M. Linsel, Chris R. Laumann, and Norman Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (5) 056702, (2025), arXiv:2405.17541 doi:10.1103/pgnx-11ph
40. Deep learning lattice gauge theories, Anuj Apte, Clay Cordova, Tzu-Chen Huang, and Anthony Ashmore, Phys. Rev. B 110 (16) 165133, (2024), arXiv:2405.14830 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.165133
41. Equivariant neural networks for robust CP observables, Sergio S\'anchez Cruz, Marina Kolosova, Clara Ram\'on \'Alvarez, Giovanni Petrucciani, and Pietro Vischia, Phys. Rev. D 110 (9) 096023, (2024), arXiv:2405.13524 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.096023
42. Building imaginary-time thermal field theory with artificial neural networks*, Tian Xu, Lingxiao Wang, Lianyi He, Kai Zhou, and Yin Jiang, Chin. Phys. C 48 (10) 103101, (2024), arXiv:2405.10493 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad5f80
43. Foundations of automatic feature extraction at LHC{\textendash}point clouds and graphs, Akanksha Bhardwaj, Partha Konar, and Vishal S. Ngairangbam, Eur. Phys. J. ST 233 (15-16) 2619–2640, (2024), arXiv:2404.16207 doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01306-z
44. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
45. Rotation-equivariant graph neural network for learning hadronic SMEFT effects, Suman Chatterjee, Sergio S\'anchez Cruz, Robert Schöfbeck, and Dennis Schwarz, Phys. Rev. D 109 (7) 076012, (2024), arXiv:2401.10323 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.076012
46. Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) 074502, (2024), arXiv:2401.06481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502
47. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
48. Multi-lattice sampling of quantum field theories via neural operator-based flows, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045053, (2024), arXiv:2401.00828 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9707
49. Gauge-equivariant multigrid neural networks, Daniel Knüttel, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, PoS LATTICE2023 037, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0037
50. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
51. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
52. Study of the topological quantities of lattice QCD using a modified DCGAN frame, Lin Gao, Heping Ying, and Jianbo Zhang, Chin. Phys. C 48 (5) 053111, (2024), arXiv:2312.03023 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad2b51
53. $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$~Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks: Benchmarking against Classical Neural Networks, Zhongtian Dong, and others, Axioms 13 (3) 188, (2024), arXiv:2311.18744 doi:10.3390/axioms13030188
54. Fixed point actions from convolutional neural networks, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, PoS LATTICE2023 038, (2024), arXiv:2311.17816 doi:10.22323/1.453.0038
55. Study of topological quantities of lattice QCD with a modified Wasserstein generative adversarial network, Lin Gao, Heping Ying, and Jianbo Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 109 (7) 074509, (2024), arXiv:2311.10108 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074509
56. Learning Quantum States and Unitaries of Bounded Gate Complexity, Haimeng Zhao, Laura Lewis, Ishaan Kannan, Yihui Quek, Hsin-Yuan Huang, and Matthias C. Caro, PRX Quantum 5 (4) 040306, (2024), arXiv:2310.19882 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.040306
57. Exact Evaluation of Hexagonal Spin-Networks for Topological Quantum Neural Networks, Matteo Lulli, Antonino Marciano, and Emanuele Zappala, Fortsch. Phys. 73 (6) e70005, (2025), arXiv:2310.03632 doi:10.1002/prop.70005
58. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
59. Breaking Free with AI: The Deconfinement Transition, Christian Ermann, Stephen Baker, and Mohamed M. Anber, (2023), arXiv:2309.07225
60. A General Framework for Equivariant Neural Networks on Reductive Lie Groups, Ilyes Batatia, Mario Geiger, Jose Munoz, Tess Smidt, Lior Silberman, and Christoph Ortner, (2023), arXiv:2306.00091
61. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
62. $\Sigma$ Resonances from a Neural Network-based Partial Wave Analysis on $K^-p$ Scattering, Jun Shi, Long-Cheng Gui, Jian Liang, and Guoming Liu, (2023), arXiv:2305.01852
63. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
64. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
65. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
66. High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning, Wan-Bing He, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Hui-Chao Song, and Kai Zhou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 (6) 88, (2023), arXiv:2303.06752 doi:10.1007/s41365-023-01233-z
67. Exploration of Efficient Neural Network for Path Optimization Method, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, PoS LATTICE2022 026, (2023), doi:10.22323/1.430.0026
68. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
69. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
70. Topological data analysis and geometry in quantum field dynamics, Daniel Spitz, (2023), doi:10.11588/heidok.00033609
71. Neural Network Gauge Field Transformation for 4D SU(3) gauge fields, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2023 040, (2023), arXiv:2405.19692
72. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
73. Simulating 2+1D Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density with Neural Flow Wavefunctions, Zhuo Chen, Di Luo, Kaiwen Hu, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2212.06835
74. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
75. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
76. Improving efficiency of the path optimization method for a gauge theory, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034509, (2023), arXiv:2210.05402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034509
77. Snowmass 2021 Computational Frontier CompF03 Topical Group Report: Machine Learning, Phiala Shanahan, and others, (2022), arXiv:2209.07559
78. Confinement in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory via persistent homology, Daniel Spitz, Julian M. Urban, and Jan M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034506, (2023), arXiv:2208.03955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034506
79. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
80. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
81. AI and Theoretical Particle Physics, Rajan Gupta, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Boram Yoon, 465–491, (2023), arXiv:2205.05803 doi:10.1142/9789811265679_0026
82. Mitigating the Hubbard sign problem with complex-valued neural networks, Marcel Rodekamp, Evan Berkowitz, Christoph Gäntgen, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 106 (12) 125139, (2022), arXiv:2203.00390 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125139
83. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
84. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
85. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
86. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09001, (2022), arXiv:2112.12493 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809001
87. Generalization capabilities of neural networks in lattice applications, Matteo Favoni, Srinath Bulusu, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 400, (2022), arXiv:2112.12474 doi:10.22323/1.396.0400
88. Preserving gauge invariance in neural networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09004, (2022), arXiv:2112.11239 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809004
89. Applying machine learning methods to prediction problems of lattice observables, Nikolai Gerasimeniuk, Maxim N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, D. L. Boyda, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, SciPost Phys. Proc. 6 020, (2022), arXiv:2112.07865 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.6.020
90. Neural quantum states for supersymmetric quantum gauge theories, Xizhi Han, and Enrico Rinaldi, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2112.05333
91. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
92. A method to challenge symmetries in data with self-supervised learning, Rupert Tombs, and Christopher G. Lester, JINST 17 (08) P08024, (2022), arXiv:2111.05442 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/P08024
93. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
94. Gauge invariant input to neural network for path optimization method, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 105 (3) 034502, (2022), arXiv:2109.11710 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034502
95. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
96. Geometric Deep Learning and Equivariant Neural Networks, Jan E. Gerken, Jimmy Aronsson, Oscar Carlsson, Hampus Linander, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, and Daniel Persson, (2021), arXiv:2105.13926
97. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
98. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
99. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
100. Quantum field-theoretic machine learning, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074510, (2021), arXiv:2102.09449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074510
101. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
102. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402