1. Information content in the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum, Nishant Agarwal, Vincent Desjacques, Donghui Jeong, and Fabian Schmidt, JCAP 03 021, (2021), arXiv:2007.04340 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/021
2. 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart\'\inez-Mirav\'e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T\'ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, JHEP 02 071, (2021), arXiv:2006.11237 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)071
3. Baryonic effects on CMB lensing and neutrino mass constraints, Eegene Chung, Simon Foreman, and Alexander van Engelen, Phys. Rev. D 101 (6) 063534, (2020), arXiv:1910.09565 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063534
4. Constraining $M_\nu$ with the bispectrum. Part I. Breaking parameter degeneracies, ChangHoon Hahn, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Emanuele Castorina, and Roman Scoccimarro, JCAP 03 040, (2020), arXiv:1909.11107 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/040
5. Updated results on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmology with Planck 2018 likelihoods, Shouvik Roy Choudhury, and Steen Hannestad, JCAP 07 037, (2020), arXiv:1907.12598 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/037
6. Measuring neutrino masses with large-scale structure: Euclid forecast with controlled theoretical error, Anton Chudaykin, and Mikhail M. Ivanov, JCAP 11 034, (2019), arXiv:1907.06666 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/034
7. A robust measurement of the first higher-derivative bias of dark matter halos, Titouan Lazeyras, and Fabian Schmidt, JCAP 11 041, (2019), arXiv:1904.11294 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/041
8. First detection of scale-dependent linear halo bias in $N$-body simulations with massive neutrinos, Chi-Ting Chiang, Marilena LoVerde, and Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (4) 041302, (2019), arXiv:1811.12412 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041302
9. Understanding the neutrino mass constraints achievable by combining CMB lensing and spectroscopic galaxy surveys, Aoife Boyle, JCAP 04 038, (2019), arXiv:1811.07636 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/038
10. Toward neutrino mass from cosmology without optical depth information, Byeonghee Yu, Robert Z. Knight, Blake D. Sherwin, Simone Ferraro, Lloyd Knox, and Marcel Schmittfull, Phys. Rev. D 107 (12) 123522, (2023), arXiv:1809.02120 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123522
11. The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts, Peter Ade, and others, JCAP 02 056, (2019), arXiv:1808.07445 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056
12. The promising future of a robust cosmological neutrino mass measurement, Thejs Brinckmann, Deanna C. Hooper, Maria Archidiacono, Julien Lesgourgues, and Tim Sprenger, JCAP 01 059, (2019), arXiv:1808.05955 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/059
13. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, N. Aghanim, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 641 A6, (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
14. The Galaxy Power Spectrum and Bispectrum in Redshift Space, Vincent Desjacques, Donghui Jeong, and Fabian Schmidt, JCAP 12 035, (2018), arXiv:1806.04015 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/035
15. Impact of bias and redshift-space modelling for the halo power spectrum: Testing the effective field theory of large-scale structure, Lucia Fonseca de la Bella, Donough Regan, David Seery, and David Parkinson, JCAP 07 011, (2020), arXiv:1805.12394 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/011
16. Infrared Resummation for Biased Tracers in Redshift Space, Mikhail M. Ivanov, and Sergey Sibiryakov, JCAP 07 053, (2018), arXiv:1804.05080 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/053
17. Neutrino masses and beyond- {\ensuremath{\Lambda}}CDM cosmology with LSST and future CMB experiments, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, David Alonso, and Joanna Dunkley, Phys. Rev. D 97 (12) 123544, (2018), arXiv:1803.07561 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123544
18. Deconstructing the neutrino mass constraint from galaxy redshift surveys, Aoife Boyle, and Eiichiro Komatsu, JCAP 03 035, (2018), arXiv:1712.01857 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/035
19. On the IR-Resummation in the EFTofLSS, Leonardo Senatore, and Gabriele Trevisan, JCAP 05 019, (2018), arXiv:1710.02178 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/019
20. Scale-dependent bias and bispectrum in neutrino separate universe simulations, Chi-Ting Chiang, Wayne Hu, Yin Li, and Marilena Loverde, Phys. Rev. D 97 (12) 123526, (2018), arXiv:1710.01310 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123526
21. The imprint of neutrinos on clustering in redshift-space, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Arka Banerjee, Neal Dalal, Emanuele Castorina, Roman Scoccimarro, Raul Angulo, and David N. Spergel, Astrophys. J. 861 (1) 53, (2018), arXiv:1708.01154 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac6bf
22. Biases from neutrino bias: to worry or not to worry?, Alvise Raccanelli, Licia Verde, and Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483 (1) 734–743, (2019), arXiv:1704.07837 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2162
23. Full covariance of CMB and lensing reconstruction power spectra, Julien Peloton, Marcel Schmittfull, Antony Lewis, Julien Carron, and Oliver Zahn, Phys. Rev. D 95 (4) 043508, (2017), arXiv:1611.01446 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043508
24. Physical effects involved in the measurements of neutrino masses with future cosmological data, Maria Archidiacono, Thejs Brinckmann, Julien Lesgourgues, and Vivian Poulin, JCAP 02 052, (2017), arXiv:1610.09852 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/052
25. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, Amir Aghamousa, and others, (2016), arXiv:1611.00036
26. Biased Tracers in Redshift Space in the EFT of Large-Scale Structure, Ashley Perko, Leonardo Senatore, Elise Jennings, and Risa H. Wechsler, (2016), arXiv:1610.09321
27. CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition, Kevork N. Abazajian, and others, (2016), arXiv:1610.02743 doi:10.2172/1352047
28. Neutrino Masses, Scale-Dependent Growth, and Redshift-Space Distortions, Oscar F. Hern\'andez, JCAP 06 018, (2017), arXiv:1608.08298 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/018
29. Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives, Naoyuki Tamura, and others, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9908 99081M, (2016), arXiv:1608.01075 doi:10.1117/12.2232103
30. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite, Luca Amendola, and others, Living Rev. Rel. 21 (1) 2, (2018), arXiv:1606.00180 doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3
31. Time-Sliced Perturbation Theory II: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Infrared Resummation, Diego Blas, Mathias Garny, Mikhail M. Ivanov, and Sergey Sibiryakov, JCAP 07 028, (2016), arXiv:1605.02149 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/07/028
32. LSS constraints with controlled theoretical uncertainties, Tobias Baldauf, Mehrdad Mirbabayi, Marko Simonovi\'c, and Matias Zaldarriaga, (2016), arXiv:1602.00674
33. Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos, Titouan Lazeyras, Christian Wagner, Tobias Baldauf, and Fabian Schmidt, JCAP 02 018, (2016), arXiv:1511.01096 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/018
34. Towards a cosmological neutrino mass detection, R. Allison, P. Caucal, E. Calabrese, J. Dunkley, and T. Louis, Phys. Rev. D 92 (12) 123535, (2015), arXiv:1509.07471 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123535
35. DEMNUni: The clustering of large-scale structures in the presence of massive neutrinos, Emanuele Castorina, Carmelita Carbone, Julien Bel, Emiliano Sefusatti, and Klaus Dolag, JCAP 07 043, (2015), arXiv:1505.07148 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/043
36. Equivalence Principle and the Baryon Acoustic Peak, Tobias Baldauf, Mehrdad Mirbabayi, Marko Simonovi\'c, and Matias Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 92 (4) 043514, (2015), arXiv:1504.04366 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.043514
37. Biased Tracers and Time Evolution, Mehrdad Mirbabayi, Fabian Schmidt, and Matias Zaldarriaga, JCAP 07 030, (2015), arXiv:1412.5169 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/030
38. Halo bias in mixed dark matter cosmologies, Marilena LoVerde, Phys. Rev. D 90 (8) 083530, (2014), arXiv:1405.4855 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.083530
39. The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures, Leonardo Senatore, and Matias Zaldarriaga, JCAP 02 013, (2015), arXiv:1404.5954 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013
40. Cosmology with massive neutrinos II: on the universality of the halo mass function and bias, Emanuele Castorina, Emiliano Sefusatti, Ravi K. Sheth, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, and Matteo Viel, JCAP 02 049, (2014), arXiv:1311.1212 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/049
41. Cosmology from clustering of Lyman-alpha galaxies: breaking non-gravitational Lyman-alpha radiative transfer degeneracies using the bispectrum, Bradley Greig, Eiichiro Komatsu, and J. Stuart B. Wyithe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431 1777, (2013), arXiv:1212.0977 doi:10.1093/mnras/stt292
42. Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report, J. Green, and others, (2012), arXiv:1208.4012
43. Euclid Definition Study Report, R. Laureijs, and others, (2011), arXiv:1110.3193
44. Distribution function approach to redshift space distortions, Uros Seljak, and Patrick McDonald, JCAP 11 039, (2011), arXiv:1109.1888 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/11/039
45. Non-Gravitational Contributions to the Clustering of Ly-alpha Selected Galaxies: Implications for Cosmological Surveys, Stuart Wyithe, and Mark Dijkstra, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415 3929, (2011), arXiv:1104.0712 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19007.x
46. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes, Diego Blas, Julien Lesgourgues, and Thomas Tram, JCAP 07 034, (2011), arXiv:1104.2933 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034
47. Tidal alignments as a contaminant of the galaxy bispectrum, Elisabeth Krause, and Christopher Hirata, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 410 2730, (2011), arXiv:1004.3611 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17638.x
48. Radiative Transfer Modeling of Lyman Alpha Emitters. II. New Effects in Galaxy Clustering, Zheng Zheng, Renyue Cen, Hy Trac, and Jordi Miralda-Escude, Astrophys. J. 726 38–64, (2010), arXiv:1003.4990 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/38
49. Nonlinear power spectrum in the presence of massive neutrinos: perturbation theory approach, galaxy bias and parameter forecasts, Shun Saito, Masahiro Takada, and Atsushi Taruya, Phys. Rev. D 80 083528, (2009), arXiv:0907.2922 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.083528
50. Tidal alignments as a contaminant of redshift space distortions, Christopher M. Hirata, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 399 1074, (2009), arXiv:0903.4929 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15353.x
51. Reconstructing Baryon Oscillations: A Lagrangian Theory Perspective, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Martin White, and J. D. Cohn, Phys. Rev. D 79 063523, (2009), arXiv:0812.2905 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063523
52. Toward a halo mass function for precision cosmology: The Limits of universality, Jeremy L. Tinker, Andrey V. Kravtsov, Anatoly Klypin, Kevork Abazajian, Michael S. Warren, Gustavo Yepes, Stefan Gottlober, and Daniel E. Holz, Astrophys. J. 688 709–728, (2008), arXiv:0803.2706 doi:10.1086/591439
53. Impact of massive neutrinos on nonlinear matter power spectrum, Shun Saito, Masahiro Takada, and Atsushi Taruya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 191301, (2008), arXiv:0801.0607 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.191301
54. Probing inflation with CMB polarization: Weak lensing effect on the covariance of CMB spectra, Jonathan Rocher, Karim Benabed, and Francois Bouchet, JCAP 05 013, (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612662 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/05/013
55. Perturbation theory reloaded: analytical calculation of non-linearity in baryonic oscillations in the real space matter power spectrum, Donghui Jeong, and Eiichiro Komatsu, Astrophys. J. 651 619–626, (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604075 doi:10.1086/507781
56. Improving Cosmological Distance Measurements by Reconstruction of the Baryon Acoustic Peak, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Hee-jong Seo, Edwin Sirko, and David Spergel, Astrophys. J. 664 675–679, (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0604362 doi:10.1086/518712
57. Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities and nonlinearities, Roman Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 70 083007, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0407214 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083007