1. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
2. Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories, Urs Wenger, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.12416
3. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
4. Quantum computation and machine learning in high energy nuclear physics, Shuzhe Shi, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5 100326, (2026), doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100326
5. Diffusion Models for SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions, H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B. -D. Sun, (2026), arXiv:2602.09045
6. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
7. Generalizable Equivariant Diffusion Models for Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, Thomas R. Ranner, Lingxiao Wang, Wei Wang, and Qianteng Zhu, (2026), arXiv:2601.19552
8. Introduction to Lattice Field Theory, Ra\'ul A. Brice\~no, (2025), arXiv:2512.22368
9. Spectral Diffusion for Sampling on ${\rm SU}(N)$, Gurtej Kanwar, and Octavio Vega, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.19877
10. Global fits and the search for new physics: past, present and future, Peter Athron, and others, (2025), arXiv:2512.14109
11. Machine Learning, Javier M. Duarte, Uros Seljak, and Kazu Terao, (2025), arXiv:2512.11133
12. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
13. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
14. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
15. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
16. Neural Triangular Transport Maps: A New Approach Towards Sampling in Lattice QCD, Andrey Bryutkin, and Youssef Marzouk, (2025), arXiv:2510.13112
17. Accurate Ground States of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2+1D and 3+1D, Thomas Spriggs, Eliska Greplova, Juan Carrasquilla, and Jannes Nys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (10) 101902, (2026), arXiv:2509.12323 doi:10.1103/wsk2-qcvy
18. Physics-informed neural network solves minimal surfaces in curved spacetime, Koji Hashimoto, Koichi Kyo, Masaki Murata, Gakuto Ogiwara, and Norihiro Tanahashi, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 7 (1) 015013, (2026), arXiv:2509.10866 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae3050
19. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
20. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
21. Simulating correlated electrons with symmetry-enforced normalizing flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekamp, Phys. Rev. Res. 8 (1) L012071, (2026), arXiv:2506.17015 doi:10.1103/4741-cvvs
22. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
23. SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flows, Janik Kreit, Dominic Schuh, Kim A. Nicoli, and Lena Funcke, (2025), arXiv:2505.19619
24. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
25. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
26. Parallel Tempered Metadynamics, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2024 061, (2025), arXiv:2503.09747 doi:10.22323/1.466.0061
27. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
28. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
29. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
30. Normalizing flows for SU(N) gauge theories employing singular value decomposition, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2024 050, (2025), arXiv:2501.18288 doi:10.22323/1.466.0050
31. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
32. Simulating the Hubbard Model with Equivariant Normalizing Flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekampb, PoS LATTICE2024 069, (2025), arXiv:2501.07371 doi:10.22323/1.466.0069
33. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
34. Novel Techniques for Global Analysis of Parton Distribution Functions, Nicholas Timothy Hunt-Smith, (2025)
35. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
36. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
37. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
38. FLAG review 2024, Y. Aoki, and others, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) 014508, (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn
39. Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, Postponed: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences}: {Workshop at NeurIPS 2024, (2024), arXiv:2410.19602
40. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
41. Review of particle physics, S. Navas, and others, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 030001, (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001
42. TASI Lectures on Physics for Machine Learning, Jim Halverson, (2024), arXiv:2408.00082
43. Future trends in lattice QCD simulations, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS EuroPLEx2023 009, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.451.0009
44. Quantum states from normalizing flows, Scott Lawrence, Arlee Shelby, and Yukari Yamauchi, (2024), arXiv:2406.02451
45. Normalizing Flows for Lattice Gauge Theories: Towards Finite Temperature Simulations, Christopher Kirwan, and Sin\'ead M. Ryan, PoS LATTICE2023 134, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0134
46. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
47. Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2023 022, (2024), arXiv:2402.12176 doi:10.22323/1.453.0022
48. A comparative lattice analysis of $SU(2)$ dark glueballs, Min-Huan Chu, Jun-Hui Lai, Wei Wang, Jialu Zhang, and Qianteng Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (8), (2024), arXiv:2402.03959 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad4e24
49. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
50. Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) 074502, (2024), arXiv:2401.06481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502
51. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
52. Multi-lattice sampling of quantum field theories via neural operator-based flows, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045053, (2024), arXiv:2401.00828 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9707
53. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
54. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
55. $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$~Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks: Benchmarking against Classical Neural Networks, Zhongtian Dong, and others, Axioms 13 (3) 188, (2024), arXiv:2311.18744 doi:10.3390/axioms13030188
56. Fixed point actions from convolutional neural networks, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, PoS LATTICE2023 038, (2024), arXiv:2311.17816 doi:10.22323/1.453.0038
57. Scaling Riemannian Diffusion Models, Aaron Lou, Minkai Xu, and Stefano Ermon, (2023), arXiv:2310.20030
58. Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with diffusion models, N. T. Hunt-Smith, W. Melnitchouk, F. Ringer, N. Sato, A. W. Thomas, and M. J. White, Comput. Phys. Commun. 296 109059, (2024), arXiv:2309.01454 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.109059
59. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
60. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
61. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
62. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
63. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
64. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
65. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
66. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
67. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
68. High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning, Wan-Bing He, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Hui-Chao Song, and Kai Zhou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 (6) 88, (2023), arXiv:2303.06752 doi:10.1007/s41365-023-01233-z
69. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
70. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
71. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
72. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
73. Learning Interpolations between Boltzmann Densities, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, (2023), arXiv:2301.07388
74. Topological data analysis and geometry in quantum field dynamics, Daniel Spitz, (2023), doi:10.11588/heidok.00033609
75. Neural Network Gauge Field Transformation for 4D SU(3) gauge fields, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2023 040, (2023), arXiv:2405.19692
76. Use of Schwinger-Dyson equation in constructing an approximate trivializing map, Peter Boyle, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Chulwoo Jung, Christoph Lehner, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2022 229, (2023), arXiv:2212.11387 doi:10.22323/1.430.0229
77. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
78. Simulating 2+1D Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density with Neural Flow Wavefunctions, Zhuo Chen, Di Luo, Kaiwen Hu, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2212.06835
79. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
80. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
81. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
82. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for 2+1D U(1) Gauge Theory Simulations in Hamiltonian Formulation, Di Luo, Shunyue Yuan, James Stokes, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2211.03198
83. Deformation Theory of Boltzmann Distributions, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences, (2022), arXiv:2210.13772
84. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
85. Theoretical guarantees for permutation-equivariant quantum neural networks, Louis Schatzki, Martin Larocca, Quynh T. Nguyen, Frederic Sauvage, and M. Cerezo, npj Quantum Inf. 10 (1) 12, (2024), arXiv:2210.09974 doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00804-1
86. Vacuum decay and Euclidean lattice Monte~Carlo, Jiayu Shen, Patrick Draper, and Aida X. El-Khadra, Phys. Rev. D 107 (9) 094506, (2023), arXiv:2210.05925 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094506
87. Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, PoS LATTICE2022 005, (2023), arXiv:2210.03139 doi:10.22323/1.430.0005
88. Report of the Snowmass 2021 Topical Group on Lattice Gauge Theory, Zohreh Davoudi, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2209.10758
89. Snowmass 2021 Computational Frontier CompF03 Topical Group Report: Machine Learning, Phiala Shanahan, and others, (2022), arXiv:2209.07559
90. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
91. Review of Particle Physics, R. L. Workman, and others, PTEP 2022 083C01, (2022), doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097
92. Confinement in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory via persistent homology, Daniel Spitz, Julian M. Urban, and Jan M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034506, (2023), arXiv:2208.03955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034506
93. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
94. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
95. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
96. Non-equilibrium Properties of Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice, Yukari Yamauchi, (2022)
97. Simulator-Based Inference with Waldo: Confidence Regions by Leveraging Prediction Algorithms and Posterior Estimators for Inverse Problems, Luca Masserano, Tommaso Dorigo, Rafael Izbicki, Mikael Kuusela, and Ann B. Lee, (2022), arXiv:2205.15680
98. Schwinger model at finite temperature and density with beta VQE, Akio Tomiya, (2022), arXiv:2205.08860
99. Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics, Alexander Bogatskiy, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.06153
100. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
101. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
102. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
103. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
104. An efficient Lorentz equivariant graph neural network for jet tagging, Shiqi Gong, Qi Meng, Jue Zhang, Huilin Qu, Congqiao Li, Sitian Qian, Weitao Du, Zhi-Ming Ma, and Tie-Yan Liu, JHEP 07 030, (2022), arXiv:2201.08187 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)030
105. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
106. Neural network reconstruction of the dense matter equation of state from neutron star observables, Shriya Soma, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, Horst Stöcker, and Kai Zhou, JCAP 08 071, (2022), arXiv:2201.01756 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/071
107. Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2021 600, (2022), arXiv:2201.01862 doi:10.22323/1.396.0600
108. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
109. Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, PoS LATTICE2021 059, (2022), arXiv:2112.15532 doi:10.22323/1.396.0059
110. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09001, (2022), arXiv:2112.12493 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809001
111. Generalization capabilities of neural networks in lattice applications, Matteo Favoni, Srinath Bulusu, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 400, (2022), arXiv:2112.12474 doi:10.22323/1.396.0400
112. Preserving gauge invariance in neural networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09004, (2022), arXiv:2112.11239 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809004
113. Simulation Intelligence: Towards a New Generation of Scientific Methods, Alexander Lavin, and others, (2021), arXiv:2112.03235
114. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
115. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
116. Reconstructing spectral functions via automatic differentiation, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) L051502, (2022), arXiv:2111.14760 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051502
117. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
118. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
119. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
120. Machine Learning Hidden Symmetries, Ziming Liu, and Max Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (18) 180201, (2022), arXiv:2109.09721 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.180201
121. Approaching nuclear interactions with lattice QCD, Marc Illa Subi\~na, (2021), arXiv:2109.10068
122. Matrix-Model Simulations Using Quantum Computing, Deep Learning, and Lattice Monte Carlo, Enrico Rinaldi, Xizhi Han, Mohammad Hassan, Yuan Feng, Franco Nori, Michael McGuigan, and Masanori Hanada, PRX Quantum 3 (1) 010324, (2022), arXiv:2108.02942 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010324
123. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
124. Scalars are universal: Equivariant machine learning, structured like classical physics, Soledad Villar, David W. Hogg, Kate Storey-Fisher, Weichi Yao, and Ben Blum-Smith, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34 28848–28863, (2021), arXiv:2106.06610
125. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
126. Symmetry-via-Duality: Invariant Neural Network Densities from Parameter-Space Correlators, Anindita Maiti, Keegan Stoner, and James Halverson, (2021), arXiv:2106.00694
127. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
128. Heavy quark potential in the quark-gluon plasma: Deep neural network meets lattice quantum chromodynamics, Shuzhe Shi, Kai Zhou, Jiaxing Zhao, Swagato Mukherjee, and Pengfei Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 105 (1) 014017, (2022), arXiv:2105.07862 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014017
129. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
130. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
131. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
132. Topological Obstructions to Autoencoding, Joshua Batson, C. Grace Haaf, Yonatan Kahn, and Daniel A. Roberts, JHEP 04 280, (2021), arXiv:2102.08380 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)280
133. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
134. Gauge-invariant and anyonic-symmetric autoregressive neural network for quantum lattice models, Di Luo, Zhuo Chen, Kaiwen Hu, Zhizhen Zhao, Vera Mikyoung Hur, and Bryan K. Clark, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (1) 013216, (2023), arXiv:2101.07243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013216
135. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
136. Simulating Yang-Mills theories with a complex coupling, Jan M. Pawlowski, Manuel Scherzer, Christian Schmidt, Felix P. G. Ziegler, and Felix Ziesch\'e, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094505, (2021), arXiv:2101.03938 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094505
137. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
138. Generative Neural Samplers for the Quantum Heisenberg Chain, Johanna Vielhaben, and Nils Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. E 103 (6) 063304, (2021), arXiv:2012.10264 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.063304
139. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402
140. Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01442
141. Quasi Anomalous Knowledge: Searching for new physics with embedded knowledge, Sang Eon Park, Dylan Rankin, Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Mikaeel Yunus, and Philip Harris, JHEP 21 030, (2020), arXiv:2011.03550 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)030
142. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
143. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
144. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
145. An equation-of-state-meter for CBM using PointNet, Manjunath Omana Kuttan, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, Andreas Redelbach, and Horst Stoecker, JHEP 21 184, (2020), arXiv:2107.05590 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)184
146. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73