1. Topological Susceptibility and QCD at Finite Theta Angle, Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, (2026), arXiv:2604.28035
2. Lattice field theories with a sign problem, Gert Aarts, and D\'enes Sexty, (2026), arXiv:2604.24290
3. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
4. Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories, Urs Wenger, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.12416
5. Scalable Generative Sampling and Multilevel Estimation for Lattice Field Theories Near Criticality, A. Singha, J. Kauffmann, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, and S. Nakajima, (2026), arXiv:2604.10209
6. Probing Proton Structure via Physics-Guided Neural Networks in Holographic QCD, Wei Kou, and Xurong Chen, (2026), arXiv:2604.02906
7. Normalizing-flow-based density of states for (1+1)D U(1) lattice gauge theory with a $θ$-term, Simran Singh, and Lena Funcke, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.12501
8. From strong interactions to Dark Matter: the non-perturbative QCD sphaleron rate, Claudio Bonanno, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.01577
9. A novel gauge-equivariant neural-network architecture for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Simon Pfahler, Daniel Knüttel, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2602.23840 doi:10.22323/1.518.0027
10. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
11. Quantum computation and machine learning in high energy nuclear physics, Shuzhe Shi, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5 100326, (2026), doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100326
12. Diffusion Models for SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions, H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B. -D. Sun, (2026), arXiv:2602.09045
13. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
14. Generalizable Equivariant Diffusion Models for Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, Thomas R. Ranner, Lingxiao Wang, Wei Wang, and Qianteng Zhu, (2026), arXiv:2601.19552
15. Variational Autoregressive Networks Applied to $\phi^4$ Field Theory Systems, Moxian Qian, and Shiyang Chen, (2025), arXiv:2512.19575
16. Global fits and the search for new physics: past, present and future, Peter Athron, and others, (2025), arXiv:2512.14109
17. Computing quantum entanglement with machine learning, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.11389
18. Machine Learning, Javier M. Duarte, Uros Seljak, and Kazu Terao, (2025), arXiv:2512.11133
19. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
20. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
21. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
22. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
23. Neural Triangular Transport Maps: A New Approach Towards Sampling in Lattice QCD, Andrey Bryutkin, and Youssef Marzouk, (2025), arXiv:2510.13112
24. The large-N limit of the topological susceptibility of SU(N) Yang-Mills theories via Parallel Tempering on Boundary Conditions, Claudio Bonanno, JHEP 01 039, (2026), arXiv:2510.08006 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)039
25. Strong CP problem, theta term and QCD topological properties, Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, (2025), arXiv:2510.03059
26. Efficient lattice field theory simulation using adaptive normalizing flow on a resistive memory-based neural differential equation solver, Meng Xu, Jichang Yang, Ning Lin, Qundao Xu, Siqi Tang, Han Wang, Xiaojuan Qi, Zhongrui Wang, and Ming Xu, (2025), arXiv:2509.12812
27. Accurate Ground States of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2+1D and 3+1D, Thomas Spriggs, Eliska Greplova, Juan Carrasquilla, and Jannes Nys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (10) 101902, (2026), arXiv:2509.12323 doi:10.1103/wsk2-qcvy
28. Physics-informed neural network solves minimal surfaces in curved spacetime, Koji Hashimoto, Koichi Kyo, Masaki Murata, Gakuto Ogiwara, and Norihiro Tanahashi, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 7 (1) 015013, (2026), arXiv:2509.10866 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae3050
29. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
30. Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithms for High Energy and Astro-Physics, Roy Thomas Forestano, (2025)
31. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
32. Simulating correlated electrons with symmetry-enforced normalizing flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekamp, Phys. Rev. Res. 8 (1) L012071, (2026), arXiv:2506.17015 doi:10.1103/4741-cvvs
33. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
34. SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flows, Janik Kreit, Dominic Schuh, Kim A. Nicoli, and Lena Funcke, (2025), arXiv:2505.19619
35. Flowing Through Hilbert Space: Quantum-Enhanced Generative Models for Lattice Field Theory, Jehu Martinez, and Andrea Delgado, 2025 International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, (2025), arXiv:2505.10553 doi:10.1109/QCE65121.2025.00266
36. JFlow: Model-Independent Spherical Jeans Analysis using Equivariant Continuous Normalizing Flows, Sung Hak Lim, Kohei Hayashi, Shun'ichi Horigome, Shigeki Matsumoto, and Mihoko M. Nojiri, (2025), arXiv:2505.00763
37. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
38. Machine-Learned Renormalization-Group-Improved Gauge Actions and Classically Perfect Gradient Flows, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (3) 031901, (2026), arXiv:2504.15870 doi:10.1103/k41k-2pnc
39. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
40. Parallel Tempered Metadynamics, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2024 061, (2025), arXiv:2503.09747 doi:10.22323/1.466.0061
41. Renormalization-inspired effective field neural networks for scalable modeling of classical and quantum many-body systems, Xi Liu, Yujun Zhao, Chun Yu Wan, Yang Zhang, and Junwei Liu, Phys. Rev. E 113 (4) L043302, (2026), arXiv:2502.17665 doi:10.1103/zmrt-3jsm
42. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
43. Exploring Generative Networks for Manifolds with Non-Trivial Topology, Shi-Yang Chen, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, PoS LATTICE2024 042, (2025), arXiv:2502.02127 doi:10.22323/1.466.0042
44. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
45. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
46. Normalizing flows for SU(N) gauge theories employing singular value decomposition, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2024 050, (2025), arXiv:2501.18288 doi:10.22323/1.466.0050
47. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
48. Simulating the Hubbard Model with Equivariant Normalizing Flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekampb, PoS LATTICE2024 069, (2025), arXiv:2501.07371 doi:10.22323/1.466.0069
49. Physics-driven learning for inverse problems in quantum chromodynamics, Gert Aarts, Kenji Fukushima, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Andreas Ipp, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (3) 154–163, (2025), arXiv:2501.05580 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00798-x
50. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
51. Machine learning a perfect lattice action for the O(3) non-linear sigma-model, Liane Backfried, (2025), doi:10.34726/hss.2025.124787
52. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
53. Application of normalizing flows to nuclear many-body perturbation theory, Pengsheng Wen, Jeremy W. Holt, and Albany Blackburn, (2024), arXiv:2412.19777
54. Extended framework for the hybrid Monte Carlo in lattice gauge theory, Norman H. Christ, Lu-Chang Jin, Christoph Lehner, Erik Lundstrum, and Nobuyuki Matsumoto, Phys. Rev. D 112 (3) 034507, (2025), arXiv:2412.19904 doi:10.1103/k6dm-lj56
55. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
56. Super-resolving normalising flows for lattice field theories, Marc Bauer, Renzo Kapust, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Finn Leon Temmen, SciPost Phys. 19 (3) 077, (2025), arXiv:2412.12842 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.3.077
57. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
58. FLAG review 2024, Y. Aoki, and others, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) 014508, (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn
59. Topological susceptibility of SU(3) pure-gauge theory from out-of-equilibrium simulations, Davide Vadacchino, Alessandro Nada, and Claudio Bonanno, PoS LATTICE2024 415, (2025), arXiv:2411.00620 doi:10.22323/1.466.0415
60. On learning higher-order cumulants in diffusion models, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6 (2) 025004, (2025), arXiv:2410.21212 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adc53a
61. Entangling Intelligence: AI-Quantum Crossovers and Perspectives, Zhuo Chen, and Di Luo, (2024), doi:10.1109/TPS-ISA62245.2024.00069
62. Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, Postponed: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences}: {Workshop at NeurIPS 2024, (2024), arXiv:2410.19602
63. Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (15) 151601, (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601
64. Super-resolution of spin configurations based on flow-based generative models, Kenta Shiina, Hiroyuki Mori, Yutaka Okabe, and Hwee Kuan Lee, J. Phys. A 57 (38) 385202, (2024), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad72ba
65. Machine Learning for Path Deformation and Bayesian Data Analysis in Selected Lattice Field Theories, Marcel Rodekamp, (2024)
66. Review of particle physics, S. Navas, and others, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 030001, (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001
67. Generative flow networks in covariant loop quantum gravity, Joseph Bunao, Pietropaolo Frisoni, Athanasios Kogios, and Jared Wogan, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) 086001, (2025), arXiv:2407.19036 doi:10.1103/pvqh-3t24
68. Quantum states from normalizing flows, Scott Lawrence, Arlee Shelby, and Yukari Yamauchi, (2024), arXiv:2406.02451
69. AdvNF: Reducing mode collapse in conditional normalising flows using adversarial learning, Vikas Kanaujia, Mathias S. Scheurer, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. 16 (5) 132, (2024), arXiv:2401.15948 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.132
70. Normalizing Flows for Lattice Gauge Theories: Towards Finite Temperature Simulations, Christopher Kirwan, and Sin\'ead M. Ryan, PoS LATTICE2023 134, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0134
71. Foundations of automatic feature extraction at LHC{\textendash}point clouds and graphs, Akanksha Bhardwaj, Partha Konar, and Vishal S. Ngairangbam, Eur. Phys. J. ST 233 (15-16) 2619–2640, (2024), arXiv:2404.16207 doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01306-z
72. Full QCD with milder topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Giuseppe Clemente, Massimo D'Elia, Lorenzo Maio, and Luca Parente, JHEP 08 236, (2024), arXiv:2404.14151 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)236
73. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
74. Multiscale Normalizing Flows for Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2023 035, (2024), arXiv:2404.10819 doi:10.22323/1.453.0035
75. Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2023 022, (2024), arXiv:2402.12176 doi:10.22323/1.453.0022
76. Mitigating topological freezing using out-of-equilibrium simulations, Claudio Bonanno, Alessandro Nada, and Davide Vadacchino, JHEP 04 126, (2024), arXiv:2402.06561 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)126
77. A comparative lattice analysis of $SU(2)$ dark glueballs, Min-Huan Chu, Jun-Hui Lai, Wei Wang, Jialu Zhang, and Qianteng Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (8), (2024), arXiv:2402.03959 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad4e24
78. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
79. Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) 074502, (2024), arXiv:2401.06481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502
80. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
81. Multi-lattice sampling of quantum field theories via neural operator-based flows, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045053, (2024), arXiv:2401.00828 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9707
82. Machine learning supergravity vacua, Costantini Riccardo, (2024)
83. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
84. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
85. Testing the standard model via the electromagnetic coupling and going beyond with axion-mediated dark matter, Sophie Mutzel, (2023)
86. Fixed point actions from convolutional neural networks, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, PoS LATTICE2023 038, (2024), arXiv:2311.17816 doi:10.22323/1.453.0038
87. Roadmap on machine learning glassy dynamics, Gerhard Jung, and others, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (2) 91–104, (2025), arXiv:2311.14752 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00791-4
88. Gravitational wave populations and cosmology with neural posterior estimation, Konstantin Leyde, Stephen R. Green, Alexandre Toubiana, and Jonathan Gair, Phys. Rev. D 109 (6) 064056, (2024), arXiv:2311.12093 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064056
89. Phase Transition Study Meets Machine Learning, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Rui Wang, and Kai Zhou, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40 (12) 122101, (2023), arXiv:2311.07274 doi:10.1088/0256-307X/40/12/122101
90. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
91. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
92. Nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors using twisted-mass fermion ensembles at the physical point, Constantia Alexandrou, Simone Bacchio, Martha Constantinou, Jacob Finkenrath, Roberto Frezzotti, Bartosz Kostrzewa, Giannis Koutsou, Gregoris Spanoudes, and Carsten Urbach, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) 034503, (2024), arXiv:2309.05774 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034503
93. Measurement of the Deeply Virtual Neutral Pion Electroproduction Cross Section off the Proton at 10.6 GeV using the CLAS12 Detector, Robert Johnston, (2023)
94. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
95. Improvement of Heatbath Algorithm in LFT using Generative models, Ali Faraz, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, Shinichi Nakajima, and Vipul Arora, PoS LATTICE2024 036, (2025), arXiv:2308.08615 doi:10.22323/1.466.0036
96. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
97. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
98. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
99. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
100. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
101. The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, Raktim Abir, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.14572 doi:10.2172/1975510
102. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
103. $\Sigma$ Resonances from a Neural Network-based Partial Wave Analysis on $K^-p$ Scattering, Jun Shi, Long-Cheng Gui, Jian Liang, and Guoming Liu, (2023), arXiv:2305.01852
104. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
105. Introdu{\c{c}}{\~a}o ao grupo SO(4) com aplica{\c{c}}{\~o}es {\`a} F{\'\i}sica: transforma{\c{c}}{\~a}o de Galilei e {\'a}tomo de hidrog{\^e}nio, Anderson L. de Jesus, Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis. 45 e20230012, (2023), doi:10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2023-0012
106. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
107. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
108. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
109. High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning, Wan-Bing He, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Hui-Chao Song, and Kai Zhou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 (6) 88, (2023), arXiv:2303.06752 doi:10.1007/s41365-023-01233-z
110. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
111. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
112. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
113. Oracle-Preserving Latent Flows, Alexander Roman, Roy T. Forestano, Konstantin T. Matchev, Katia Matcheva, and Eyup B. Unlu, (2023), arXiv:2302.00806
114. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
115. Towards the Application of Skewed Detailed Balance in Lattice Gauge Theories, Joao C. Pinto Barros, and Marina Krstic Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 028, (2023), arXiv:2402.01046 doi:10.22323/1.430.0028
116. Deep learning symmetries and their Lie groups, algebras, and subalgebras from first principles, Roy T. Forestano, Konstantin T. Matchev, Katia Matcheva, Alexander Roman, Eyup B. Unlu, and Sarunas Verner, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 4 (2) 025027, (2023), arXiv:2301.05638 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acd989
117. Phase Transitions in Particle Physics}: {Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, Gert Aarts, and others, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133 104070, (2023), arXiv:2301.04382 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104070
118. Topological data analysis and geometry in quantum field dynamics, Daniel Spitz, (2023), doi:10.11588/heidok.00033609
119. Neural Network Gauge Field Transformation for 4D SU(3) gauge fields, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2023 040, (2023), arXiv:2405.19692
120. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
121. Simulating 2+1D Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density with Neural Flow Wavefunctions, Zhuo Chen, Di Luo, Kaiwen Hu, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2212.06835
122. Clifford Fourier Transforms in (2+1)D Lattice Simulations of Soliton Propagations, Sadataka Furui, and Serge Dos Santos, PoS LATTICE2022 369, (2023), arXiv:2302.07871 doi:10.22323/1.430.0369
123. Variational Neural-Network Ansatz for Continuum Quantum Field Theory, John M. Martyn, Khadijeh Najafi, and Di Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (8) 081601, (2023), arXiv:2212.00782 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.081601
124. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
125. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
126. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
127. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for 2+1D U(1) Gauge Theory Simulations in Hamiltonian Formulation, Di Luo, Shunyue Yuan, James Stokes, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2211.03198
128. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
129. Vacuum decay and Euclidean lattice Monte~Carlo, Jiayu Shen, Patrick Draper, and Aida X. El-Khadra, Phys. Rev. D 107 (9) 094506, (2023), arXiv:2210.05925 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094506
130. Neural Importance Sampling for Rapid and Reliable Gravitational-Wave Inference, Maximilian Dax, Stephen R. Green, Jonathan Gair, Michael Pürrer, Jonas Wildberger, Jakob H. Macke, Alessandra Buonanno, and Bernhard Schölkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (17) 171403, (2023), arXiv:2210.05686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.171403
131. Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, PoS LATTICE2022 005, (2023), arXiv:2210.03139 doi:10.22323/1.430.0005
132. Report of the Snowmass 2021 Topical Group on Lattice Gauge Theory, Zohreh Davoudi, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2209.10758
133. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
134. Review of Particle Physics, R. L. Workman, and others, PTEP 2022 083C01, (2022), doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097
135. Confinement in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory via persistent homology, Daniel Spitz, Julian M. Urban, and Jan M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034506, (2023), arXiv:2208.03955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034506
136. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
137. Analysis of Phonetic Soliton Propagation in Neutral Weyl Fermion-sea, Sadataka Furui, and Serge Dos Santos, (2022), arXiv:2209.11168
138. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
139. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
140. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
141. Non-equilibrium Properties of Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice, Yukari Yamauchi, (2022)
142. Exploring parameter spaces with artificial intelligence and machine learning black-box optimization algorithms, Fernando Abreu de Souza, Miguel Crispim Rom\~ao, Nuno Filipe Castro, Mehraveh Nikjoo, and Werner Porod, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 035004, (2023), arXiv:2206.09223 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.035004
143. Lattice scalar field theory at complex coupling, Scott Lawrence, Hyunwoo Oh, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114503, (2022), arXiv:2205.12303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503
144. Schwinger model at finite temperature and density with beta VQE, Akio Tomiya, (2022), arXiv:2205.08860
145. Variational Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories, Paolo Stornati, (2022), doi:10.18452/24304
146. AI and Theoretical Particle Physics, Rajan Gupta, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Boram Yoon, 465–491, (2023), arXiv:2205.05803 doi:10.1142/9789811265679_0026
147. Non-Hertz-Millis scaling of the antiferromagnetic quantum critical metal via scalable Hybrid Monte Carlo, Peter Lunts, Michael S. Albergo, and Michael Lindsey, Nature Commun. 14 (1) 2547, (2023), arXiv:2204.14241 doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37686-4
148. Applications of deep learning in high energy nuclear physics, WANG. LingXiao, PANG. LongGang, and ZHOU. Kai, Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astro. 52 (5) 252003, (2022), doi:10.1360/SSPMA-2021-0300
149. Applications of Neural Probabilistic Modeling to High Energy and Astrophysics, John Andrew Tamanas, (2022)
150. Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences, Anna Dawid, and others, (2025), arXiv:2204.04198 doi:10.1017/9781009504942
151. Efficient representation and learning of quantum many-body states, Hongye Hu, (2022)
152. Numerical and geometrical aspects of flow-based variational quantum Monte Carlo, James Stokes, Brian Chen, and Shravan Veerapaneni, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 4 (2) 021001, (2023), arXiv:2203.14824 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acc8b9
153. Hierarchical autoregressive neural networks for statistical systems, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 281 108502, (2022), arXiv:2203.10989 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108502
154. Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics, Alexander Bogatskiy, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.06153
155. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
156. Mitigating the Hubbard sign problem with complex-valued neural networks, Marcel Rodekamp, Evan Berkowitz, Christoph Gäntgen, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 106 (12) 125139, (2022), arXiv:2203.00390 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125139
157. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
158. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
159. Estimating the Euclidean quantum propagator with deep generative modeling of Feynman paths, Yanming Che, Clemens Gneiting, and Franco Nori, Phys. Rev. B 105 (21) 214205, (2022), arXiv:2202.02750 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214205
160. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
161. An efficient Lorentz equivariant graph neural network for jet tagging, Shiqi Gong, Qi Meng, Jue Zhang, Huilin Qu, Congqiao Li, Sitian Qian, Weitao Du, Zhi-Ming Ma, and Tie-Yan Liu, JHEP 07 030, (2022), arXiv:2201.08187 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)030
162. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
163. Neural network reconstruction of the dense matter equation of state from neutron star observables, Shriya Soma, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, Horst Stöcker, and Kai Zhou, JCAP 08 071, (2022), arXiv:2201.01756 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/071
164. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
165. Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, PoS LATTICE2021 059, (2022), arXiv:2112.15532 doi:10.22323/1.396.0059
166. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09001, (2022), arXiv:2112.12493 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809001
167. Generalization capabilities of neural networks in lattice applications, Matteo Favoni, Srinath Bulusu, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 400, (2022), arXiv:2112.12474 doi:10.22323/1.396.0400
168. Preserving gauge invariance in neural networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09004, (2022), arXiv:2112.11239 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809004
169. Applying machine learning methods to prediction problems of lattice observables, Nikolai Gerasimeniuk, Maxim N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, D. L. Boyda, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, SciPost Phys. Proc. 6 020, (2022), arXiv:2112.07865 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.6.020
170. Neural quantum states for supersymmetric quantum gauge theories, Xizhi Han, and Enrico Rinaldi, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2112.05333
171. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
172. Prediction and compression of lattice QCD data using machine learning algorithms on quantum annealer, Boram Yoon, Chia Cheng Chang, Garrett T. Kenyon, Nga T. T. Nguyen, and Ermal Rrapaj, PoS LATTICE2021 143, (2021), arXiv:2112.02120 doi:10.22323/1.396.0143
173. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
174. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
175. Reconstructing spectral functions via automatic differentiation, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) L051502, (2022), arXiv:2111.14760 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051502
176. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
177. Improved topological sampling for lattice gauge theories, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, PoS LATTICE2021 183, (2022), arXiv:2111.05745 doi:10.22323/1.396.0183
178. A method to challenge symmetries in data with self-supervised learning, Rupert Tombs, and Christopher G. Lester, JINST 17 (08) P08024, (2022), arXiv:2111.05442 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/P08024
179. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
180. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
181. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
182. Machine Learning Hidden Symmetries, Ziming Liu, and Max Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (18) 180201, (2022), arXiv:2109.09721 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.180201
183. Inhomogeneities in the two-flavor chiral Gross-Neveu model, Julian J. Lenz, Michael Mandl, and Andreas Wipf, Phys. Rev. D 105 (3) 034512, (2022), arXiv:2109.05525 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034512
184. Approaching nuclear interactions with lattice QCD, Marc Illa Subi\~na, (2021), arXiv:2109.10068
185. Learning Langevin dynamics with QCD phase transition, Lingxiao Wang, Lijia Jiang, and Kai Zhou, EPJ Web Conf. 259 10017, (2022), arXiv:2108.03987 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225910017
186. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
187. Topological sampling through windings, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (10) 873, (2021), arXiv:2106.14234 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6
188. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
189. Latent Space Refinement for Deep Generative Models, Ramon Winterhalder, Marco Bellagente, and Benjamin Nachman, (2021), arXiv:2106.00792
190. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
191. Ab-initio study of interacting fermions at finite temperature with neural canonical transformation, Hao Xie, Linfeng Zhang, and Lei Wang, (2021), arXiv:2105.08644 doi:10.4208/jml.220113
192. Heavy quark potential in the quark-gluon plasma: Deep neural network meets lattice quantum chromodynamics, Shuzhe Shi, Kai Zhou, Jiaxing Zhao, Swagato Mukherjee, and Pengfei Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 105 (1) 014017, (2022), arXiv:2105.07862 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014017
193. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
194. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
195. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
196. A.I. for nuclear physics, Paulo Bedaque, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (3) 100, (2021), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00290-x
197. Quantum field-theoretic machine learning, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074510, (2021), arXiv:2102.09449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074510
198. Topological Obstructions to Autoencoding, Joshua Batson, C. Grace Haaf, Yonatan Kahn, and Daniel A. Roberts, JHEP 04 280, (2021), arXiv:2102.08380 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)280
199. Normalizing Flows for Microscopic Many-Body Calculations: An Application to the Nuclear Equation of State, Jack Brady, Pengsheng Wen, and Jeremy W. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (6) 062701, (2021), arXiv:2102.02726 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.062701
200. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
201. Gauge-invariant and anyonic-symmetric autoregressive neural network for quantum lattice models, Di Luo, Zhuo Chen, Kaiwen Hu, Zhizhen Zhao, Vera Mikyoung Hur, and Bryan K. Clark, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (1) 013216, (2023), arXiv:2101.07243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013216
202. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
203. Simulating Yang-Mills theories with a complex coupling, Jan M. Pawlowski, Manuel Scherzer, Christian Schmidt, Felix P. G. Ziegler, and Felix Ziesch\'e, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094505, (2021), arXiv:2101.03938 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094505
204. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
205. Generative Neural Samplers for the Quantum Heisenberg Chain, Johanna Vielhaben, and Nils Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. E 103 (6) 063304, (2021), arXiv:2012.10264 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.063304
206. Taming nucleon density distributions with deep neural network, Zu-Xing Yang, Xiao-Hua Fan, Peng Yin, and Wei Zuo, Phys. Lett. B 823 136650, (2021), arXiv:2012.07334 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136650
207. Explainable machine learning of the underlying physics of high-energy particle collisions, Yue Shi Lai, Duff Neill, Mateusz P\losko\'n, and Felix Ringer, Phys. Lett. B 829 137055, (2022), arXiv:2012.06582 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137055
208. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402
209. Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01442
210. Quasi Anomalous Knowledge: Searching for new physics with embedded knowledge, Sang Eon Park, Dylan Rankin, Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Mikaeel Yunus, and Philip Harris, JHEP 21 030, (2020), arXiv:2011.03550 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)030
211. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
212. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
213. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
214. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
215. Neural resampler for Monte Carlo reweighting with preserved uncertainties, Benjamin Nachman, and Jesse Thaler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) 076004, (2020), arXiv:2007.11586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.076004
216. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
217. Report from the A.I. For Nuclear Physics Workshop, Paulo Bedaque, and others, (2020), arXiv:2006.05422
218. Fully probabilistic quasar continua predictions near Lyman-$\alpha$ with conditional neural spline flows, David M. Reiman, John Tamanas, J. Xavier Prochaska, and Dominika \vDurov\vc\'\ikov\'a, (2020), arXiv:2006.00615
219. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
220. Deep Learning and Bayesian Techniques applied to Big Data in Industry and Neutrino Oscillations, Sebastian Pina Otey, (2020)
221. Normalizing Flows: An Introduction and Review of Current Methods, Ivan Kobyzev, Simon J. D. Prince, and Marcus A. Brubaker, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 43 (11) 3964–3979, (2021), arXiv:1908.09257 doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2992934
222. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73