1. Analytic Bijections for Smooth and Interpretable Normalizing Flows, Mathis Gerdes, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, (2026), arXiv:2601.10774
2. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
3. Towards High-redshift Cosmology with Lyman-break Galaxies Detected by LSST, John Franklin Crenshaw, (2025)
4. Machine learning assisted parameter-space searches for lensed gravitational waves, Giulia Campailla, Marco Raveri, Wayne Hu, and Jose Mar\'\ia Ezquiaga, Phys. Rev. D 113 (8) 083510, (2026), arXiv:2509.06901 doi:10.1103/j87w-hpvx
5. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
6. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
7. Quantum Machine Learning in Multi-Qubit Phase-Space Part I: Foundations, Timothy Heightman, Edward Jiang, Ruth Mora-Soto, Maciej Lewenstein, and Marcin P\lodzie\'n, (2025), arXiv:2507.12117
8. Weakly supervised anomaly detection with event-level variables, Liam Brennan, Tamas Almos Vami, Oz Amram, Sanjana Sekhar, Yuta Takahashi, Louis Moureaux, Manuel Sommerhalder, Petar Maksimovic, Tianji Cai, and Nathaniel Craig, Phys. Rev. D 112 (5) 055040, (2025), arXiv:2504.13249 doi:10.1103/rk29-518p
9. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
10. Efficient Monte~Carlo event generation for neutrino-nucleus exclusive cross sections, Mathias El Baz, Federico S\'anchez, Natalie Jachowicz, Kajetan Niewczas, Ashish Kumar Jha, and Alexis Nikolakopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) 113001, (2025), arXiv:2502.14452 doi:10.1103/v7sz-vn3b
11. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
12. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
13. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
14. The Flow of LHC Events - Generative models for LHC simulations and inference, Theo Heimel, (2024), doi:10.11588/heidok.00034758
15. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
16. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
17. Returning CP-observables to the frames they belong, Jona Ackerschott, Rahool Kumar Barman, Dorival Gon\ccalves, Theo Heimel, and Tilman Plehn, SciPost Phys. 17 (1) 001, (2024), arXiv:2308.00027 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.001
18. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
19. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
20. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
21. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
22. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
23. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
24. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
25. via machinae: Searching for stellar streams using unsupervised machine learning, David Shih, Matthew R. Buckley, Lina Necib, and John Tamanas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 509 (4) 5992–6007, (2021), arXiv:2104.12789 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3372
26. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
27. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
28. Quasi Anomalous Knowledge: Searching for new physics with embedded knowledge, Sang Eon Park, Dylan Rankin, Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Mikaeel Yunus, and Philip Harris, JHEP 21 030, (2020), arXiv:2011.03550 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)030
29. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
30. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
31. Normalizing Flows: An Introduction and Review of Current Methods, Ivan Kobyzev, Simon J. D. Prince, and Marcus A. Brubaker, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 43 (11) 3964–3979, (2021), arXiv:1908.09257 doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2992934