1. Sampling two-dimensional spin systems with transformers, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, Adam Stefa\'nski, and Dawid Zapolski, (2026), arXiv:2604.27738
2. Lattice field theories with a sign problem, Gert Aarts, and D\'enes Sexty, (2026), arXiv:2604.24290
3. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
4. Scalable Generative Sampling and Multilevel Estimation for Lattice Field Theories Near Criticality, A. Singha, J. Kauffmann, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, and S. Nakajima, (2026), arXiv:2604.10209
5. Enhanced Sampling Techniques for Lattice Gauge Theory, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.01287
6. Variance reduction in lattice QCD observables via normalizing flows, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Yang Fu, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, (2026), arXiv:2603.02984
7. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
8. Quantum computation and machine learning in high energy nuclear physics, Shuzhe Shi, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5 100326, (2026), doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100326
9. Neural-network quantum states for the nuclear many-body problem, Alessandro Lovato, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryce Fore, Morten Hjorth-Jensen, Jane Kim, Arnau Rios, and Noemi Rocco, (2026), arXiv:2602.13826
10. Diffusion Models for SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions, H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B. -D. Sun, (2026), arXiv:2602.09045
11. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
12. Intrinsic Width of the Flux Tube as a tool to explore confining mechanisms in Lattice Gauge Theories, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, (2026), arXiv:2601.19520
13. Toward Scalable Normalizing Flows for the Hubbard Model, Janik Kreit, Andrea Bulgarelli, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Dominic Schuh, Simran Singh, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.18273
14. Analytic Bijections for Smooth and Interpretable Normalizing Flows, Mathis Gerdes, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, (2026), arXiv:2601.10774
15. Novel Analysis Techniques and Instrumentation for Neutrino Mass Measurement, Razu Mohiuddin, (2026)
16. Introduction to Lattice Field Theory, Ra\'ul A. Brice\~no, (2025), arXiv:2512.22368
17. Variational Autoregressive Networks Applied to $\phi^4$ Field Theory Systems, Moxian Qian, and Shiyang Chen, (2025), arXiv:2512.19575
18. Global fits and the search for new physics: past, present and future, Peter Athron, and others, (2025), arXiv:2512.14109
19. Computing quantum entanglement with machine learning, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.11389
20. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
21. Application~of~Flow-Based~Machine~Learning~Models~to~Nuclear~Many-Body~Calculations, Pengsheng Wen, (2025)
22. Particle Monte Carlo methods for Lattice Field Theory, David Yallup, 39th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Includes Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (ML4PS), (2025), arXiv:2511.15196
23. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
24. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
25. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
26. SCORENF: Score-based Normalizing Flows for Sampling Unnormalized distributions, Vikas Kanaujia, and Vipul Arora, (2025), arXiv:2510.21330
27. Neural Triangular Transport Maps: A New Approach Towards Sampling in Lattice QCD, Andrey Bryutkin, and Youssef Marzouk, (2025), arXiv:2510.13112
28. Efficient lattice field theory simulation using adaptive normalizing flow on a resistive memory-based neural differential equation solver, Meng Xu, Jichang Yang, Ning Lin, Qundao Xu, Siqi Tang, Han Wang, Xiaojuan Qi, Zhongrui Wang, and Ming Xu, (2025), arXiv:2509.12812
29. Physics-informed neural network solves minimal surfaces in curved spacetime, Koji Hashimoto, Koichi Kyo, Masaki Murata, Gakuto Ogiwara, and Norihiro Tanahashi, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 7 (1) 015013, (2026), arXiv:2509.10866 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae3050
30. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
31. Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS QCHSC24 034, (2025), arXiv:2508.20610 doi:10.22323/1.483.0034
32. Viability of perturbative expansion for quantum field theories on neurons, Srimoyee Sen, and Varun Vaidya, (2025), arXiv:2508.03810
33. Toward an event-level analysis of hadron structure using differential programming, Kevin Braga, Markus Diefenthaler, Steven Goldenberg, Daniel Lersch, Yaohang Li, Jian-Wei Qiu, Kishansingh Rajput, Felix Ringer, Nobuo Sato, and Malachi Schram, (2025), arXiv:2507.15768
34. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
35. Application of Neural Networks for Calculating Functional Integrals in Quantum Field Theory, A. V. Vasiliev, A. S. Ivanov, D. V. Salnikov, and V. V. Chistiakov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 56 (3) 704–708, (2025), doi:10.1134/S1063779624702162
36. Simulating correlated electrons with symmetry-enforced normalizing flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekamp, Phys. Rev. Res. 8 (1) L012071, (2026), arXiv:2506.17015 doi:10.1103/4741-cvvs
37. ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Factory Study, J. Altmann, and others, 5/2025, (2025), arXiv:2506.15390 doi:10.23731/CYRM-2025-005
38. Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives, Giovanni Acampora, and others, (2025), arXiv:2505.23860
39. Casimir effect in critical O(N) models from nonequilibrium Monte Carlo simulations, Andrea Bulgarelli, Michele Caselle, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. E 112 (6) 064126, (2025), arXiv:2505.20403 doi:10.1103/lcvl-dgv4
40. SESaMo: Symmetry-Enforcing Stochastic Modulation for Normalizing Flows, Janik Kreit, Dominic Schuh, Kim A. Nicoli, and Lena Funcke, (2025), arXiv:2505.19619
41. High-precision lattice QCD, Fabian Frech, (2025), doi:10.25926/buw/0-870
42. Neural-Network Correlation Functions for Light Nuclei with Chiral Two- and Three-Body Interactions, Pengsheng Wen, Alexandros Gezerlis, and Jeremy W. Holt, (2025), arXiv:2505.11442
43. Flowing Through Hilbert Space: Quantum-Enhanced Generative Models for Lattice Field Theory, Jehu Martinez, and Andrea Delgado, 2025 International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, (2025), arXiv:2505.10553 doi:10.1109/QCE65121.2025.00266
44. Machine Learning Methods for Cross Section Measurements, Krish Desai, (2025)
45. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
46. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
47. Parallel Tempered Metadynamics, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2024 061, (2025), arXiv:2503.09747 doi:10.22323/1.466.0061
48. Hierarchical autoregressive neural networks in three-dimensional statistical system, Piotr Bia\las, Vaibhav Chahar, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, Mateusz Winiarski, and Dawid Zapolski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 318 109892, (2026), arXiv:2503.08610 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109892
49. Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena, Ankur Singha, Elia Cellini, Kim A. Nicoli, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, and Shinichi Nakajima, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2025), arXiv:2503.08918
50. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
51. Exploring Generative Networks for Manifolds with Non-Trivial Topology, Shi-Yang Chen, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, PoS LATTICE2024 042, (2025), arXiv:2502.02127 doi:10.22323/1.466.0042
52. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
53. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
54. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
55. Simulating the Hubbard Model with Equivariant Normalizing Flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekampb, PoS LATTICE2024 069, (2025), arXiv:2501.07371 doi:10.22323/1.466.0069
56. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
57. Novel Techniques for Global Analysis of Parton Distribution Functions, Nicholas Timothy Hunt-Smith, (2025)
58. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
59. Stochastic normalizing flows for Effective String Theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 027, (2025), arXiv:2412.19109 doi:10.22323/1.466.0027
60. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
61. Super-resolving normalising flows for lattice field theories, Marc Bauer, Renzo Kapust, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Finn Leon Temmen, SciPost Phys. 19 (3) 077, (2025), arXiv:2412.12842 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.3.077
62. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
63. Exotic phases in finite-density {\ensuremath{\mathbb{Z}}}$_{3}$ theories, Michael C. Ogilvie, Moses A. Schindler, and Stella T. Schindler, JHEP 03 077, (2025), arXiv:2411.11773 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)077
64. FLAG review 2024, Y. Aoki, and others, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) 014508, (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn
65. On learning higher-order cumulants in diffusion models, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6 (2) 025004, (2025), arXiv:2410.21212 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adc53a
66. Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (15) 151601, (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601
67. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
68. NETS: A Non-Equilibrium Transport Sampler, Michael S. Albergo, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, (2024), arXiv:2410.02711
69. Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 090, (2025), arXiv:2409.15937 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090
70. Super-resolution of spin configurations based on flow-based generative models, Kenta Shiina, Hiroyuki Mori, Yutaka Okabe, and Hwee Kuan Lee, J. Phys. A 57 (38) 385202, (2024), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad72ba
71. The structure of hadrons and other potential phases of QCD, Stella T. Schindler, (2024)
72. Generative flow networks in covariant loop quantum gravity, Joseph Bunao, Pietropaolo Frisoni, Athanasios Kogios, and Jared Wogan, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) 086001, (2025), arXiv:2407.19036 doi:10.1103/pvqh-3t24
73. Future trends in lattice QCD simulations, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS EuroPLEx2023 009, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.451.0009
74. AdvNF: Reducing mode collapse in conditional normalising flows using adversarial learning, Vikas Kanaujia, Mathias S. Scheurer, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. 16 (5) 132, (2024), arXiv:2401.15948 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.132
75. Flow-based nonperturbative simulation of first-order phase transitions, Yang Bai, and Ting-Kuo Chen, JHEP 10 198, (2024), arXiv:2404.18323 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)198
76. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
77. Multiscale Normalizing Flows for Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2023 035, (2024), arXiv:2404.10819 doi:10.22323/1.453.0035
78. Illuminating Systematic Trends in Nuclear Data with Generative Machine Learning Models, Jordan M. R. Fox, and Kyle A. Wendt, (2024), arXiv:2403.16389
79. Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2023 022, (2024), arXiv:2402.12176 doi:10.22323/1.453.0022
80. A comparative lattice analysis of $SU(2)$ dark glueballs, Min-Huan Chu, Jun-Hui Lai, Wei Wang, Jialu Zhang, and Qianteng Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (8), (2024), arXiv:2402.03959 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad4e24
81. Global sampling of Feynman's diagrams through normalizing flow, Luca Leoni, and Cesare Franchini, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (3) 033041, (2024), arXiv:2402.00736 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033041
82. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
83. Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network, Kieran Holland, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Urs Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 110 (7) 074502, (2024), arXiv:2401.06481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074502
84. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
85. Multi-lattice sampling of quantum field theories via neural operator-based flows, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045053, (2024), arXiv:2401.00828 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9707
86. Stochastic Approaches and the Physics of Ultracold Fermions: From Lattice Simulations to Machine Learning, Marc Bauer, (2024), doi:10.11588/heidok.00035711
87. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
88. MLMC: Machine Learning Monte Carlo for Lattice Gauge Theory, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2023 036, (2024), arXiv:2312.08936 doi:10.22323/1.453.0036
89. Decimation map in 2D for accelerating HMC, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, Richard C. Brower, and Taku Izubuchi, PoS LATTICE2023 033, (2024), arXiv:2312.04800 doi:10.22323/1.453.0033
90. Extraction of the microscopic properties of quasiparticles using deep neural networks, Olga Soloveva, Andrea Palermo, and Elena Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 110 (3) 034908, (2024), arXiv:2311.15984 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.034908
91. Roadmap on machine learning glassy dynamics, Gerhard Jung, and others, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (2) 91–104, (2025), arXiv:2311.14752 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00791-4
92. Convex optimization of contour deformations, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 110 (1) 014508, (2024), arXiv:2311.13002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.014508
93. Phase Transition Study Meets Machine Learning, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Rui Wang, and Kai Zhou, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40 (12) 122101, (2023), arXiv:2311.07274 doi:10.1088/0256-307X/40/12/122101
94. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
95. Diffusion model approach to simulating electron-proton scattering events, Peter Devlin, Jian-Wei Qiu, Felix Ringer, and Nobuo Sato, Phys. Rev. D 110 (1) 016030, (2024), arXiv:2310.16308 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.016030
96. Normalizing Flows for Bayesian Posteriors: Reproducibility and Deployment, Yukari Yamauchi, Landon Buskirk, Pablo Giuliani, and Kyle Godbey, (2023), arXiv:2310.04635
97. Learning Trivializing Flows in a $\phi^4$ theory from coarser lattices, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, PoS LATTICE2023 013, (2024), arXiv:2310.03381 doi:10.22323/1.453.0013
98. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
99. Sampling Nambu-Goto theory using Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2023 015, (2024), arXiv:2309.14983 doi:10.22323/1.453.0015
100. Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with diffusion models, N. T. Hunt-Smith, W. Melnitchouk, F. Ringer, N. Sato, A. W. Thomas, and M. J. White, Comput. Phys. Commun. 296 109059, (2024), arXiv:2309.01454 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.109059
101. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
102. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
103. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
104. Neural network field theories: non-Gaussianity, actions, and locality, Mehmet Demirtas, James Halverson, Anindita Maiti, Matthew D. Schwartz, and Keegan Stoner, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (1) 015002, (2024), arXiv:2307.03223 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad17d3
105. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
106. Implicit quantile networks for emulation in jet physics, Braden Kronheim, Ali Al Kadhim, Michelle P. Kuchera, Harrison B. Prosper, and Raghuram Ramanujan, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045073, (2024), arXiv:2306.15053 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9884
107. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
108. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
109. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
110. Mutual information of spin systems from autoregressive neural networks, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 108 (4) 044140, (2023), arXiv:2304.13412 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.044140
111. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
112. Fluctuation without dissipation: Microcanonical Langevin Monte Carlo, Jakob Robnik, and Uro\vs Seljak, (2023), arXiv:2303.18221
113. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
114. High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning, Wan-Bing He, Yu-Gang Ma, Long-Gang Pang, Hui-Chao Song, and Kai Zhou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 (6) 88, (2023), arXiv:2303.06752 doi:10.1007/s41365-023-01233-z
115. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
116. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
117. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
118. T-mu phase diagram using classical-quantum hybrid algorithm, Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2022 039, (2023), doi:10.22323/1.430.0039
119. Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 019, (2023), arXiv:2301.01504 doi:10.22323/1.430.0019
120. 基于机器学习的重离子碰撞中QCD相变 的研究, Fupeng Li, Longgang Pang, and Xinnian Wang, Nucl. Tech. 46 (4) 040014, (2023), doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040014
121. Use of Schwinger-Dyson equation in constructing an approximate trivializing map, Peter Boyle, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Chulwoo Jung, Christoph Lehner, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2022 229, (2023), arXiv:2212.11387 doi:10.22323/1.430.0229
122. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
123. Simulating 2+1D Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at Finite Density with Neural Flow Wavefunctions, Zhuo Chen, Di Luo, Kaiwen Hu, and Bryan K. Clark, (2022), arXiv:2212.06835
124. Simulating first-order phase transition with hierarchical autoregressive networks, Piotr Bia\las, Paulina Czarnota, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (5) 054127, (2023), arXiv:2212.04955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054127
125. Variational Neural-Network Ansatz for Continuum Quantum Field Theory, John M. Martyn, Khadijeh Najafi, and Di Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (8) 081601, (2023), arXiv:2212.00782 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.081601
126. Precision studies of QCD in the low energy domain of the EIC, V. D. Burkert, and others, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131 104032, (2023), arXiv:2211.15746 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104032
127. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos Martinez, PoS LATTICE2022 001, (2023), arXiv:2211.12806 doi:10.22323/1.430.0001
128. Deep-learning quasi-particle masses from QCD equation of state, Fu-Peng Li, Hong-Liang Lü, Long-Gang Pang, and Guang-You Qin, Phys. Lett. B 844 138088, (2023), arXiv:2211.07994 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138088
129. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
130. flowMC: Normalizing flow enhanced sampling package for probabilistic inference in JAX, Kaze W. k. Wong, Marylou Gabri\'e, and Daniel Foreman-Mackey, J. Open Source Softw. 8 (83) 5021, (2023), arXiv:2211.06397 doi:10.21105/joss.05021
131. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
132. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
133. Neural Importance Sampling for Rapid and Reliable Gravitational-Wave Inference, Maximilian Dax, Stephen R. Green, Jonathan Gair, Michael Pürrer, Jonas Wildberger, Jakob H. Macke, Alessandra Buonanno, and Bernhard Schölkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (17) 171403, (2023), arXiv:2210.05686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.171403
134. Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, PoS LATTICE2022 005, (2023), arXiv:2210.03139 doi:10.22323/1.430.0005
135. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
136. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
137. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
138. Accelerating astronomical and cosmological inference with preconditioned Monte Carlo, Minas Karamanis, Florian Beutler, John A. Peacock, David Nabergoj, and Uros Seljak, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516 (2) 1644–1653, (2022), arXiv:2207.05652 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2272
139. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
140. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
141. Non-equilibrium Properties of Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice, Yukari Yamauchi, (2022)
142. Comment on the subtlety of defining a real-time path integral in lattice gauge theories, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, PTEP 2022 (9) 093B03, (2022), arXiv:2206.00865 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac106
143. Lattice scalar field theory at complex coupling, Scott Lawrence, Hyunwoo Oh, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114503, (2022), arXiv:2205.12303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503
144. Machine learning in the search for new fundamental physics, Georgia Karagiorgi, Gregor Kasieczka, Scott Kravitz, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, Nature Rev. Phys. 4 (6) 399–412, (2022), doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00455-1
145. Schwinger model at finite temperature and density with beta VQE, Akio Tomiya, (2022), arXiv:2205.08860
146. AI and Theoretical Particle Physics, Rajan Gupta, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Boram Yoon, 465–491, (2023), arXiv:2205.05803 doi:10.1142/9789811265679_0026
147. Neural Annealing and Visualization of Autoregressive Neural Networks in the Newman{\textendash}Moore Model, Estelle M. Inack, Stewart Morawetz, and Roger G. Melko, Condens. Mat. 7 (2) 38, (2022), arXiv:2204.11272 doi:10.3390/condmat7020038
148. Applications of deep learning in high energy nuclear physics, WANG. LingXiao, PANG. LongGang, and ZHOU. Kai, Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astro. 52 (5) 252003, (2022), doi:10.1360/SSPMA-2021-0300
149. Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences, Anna Dawid, and others, (2025), arXiv:2204.04198 doi:10.1017/9781009504942
150. Efficient representation and learning of quantum many-body states, Hongye Hu, (2022)
151. Numerical and geometrical aspects of flow-based variational quantum Monte Carlo, James Stokes, Brian Chen, and Shravan Veerapaneni, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 4 (2) 021001, (2023), arXiv:2203.14824 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acc8b9
152. Hierarchical autoregressive neural networks for statistical systems, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 281 108502, (2022), arXiv:2203.10989 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108502
153. Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics, Alexander Bogatskiy, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.06153
154. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
155. Differentiable Matrix Elements with MadJax, Lukas Heinrich, and Michael Kagan, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2438 (1) 012137, (2023), arXiv:2203.00057 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2438/1/012137
156. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
157. Group-equivariant autoencoder for identifying spontaneously broken symmetries, Devanshu Agrawal, Adrian Del Maestro, Steven Johnston, and James Ostrowski, Phys. Rev. E 107 (5) 054104, (2023), arXiv:2202.06319 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054104
158. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
159. Estimating the Euclidean quantum propagator with deep generative modeling of Feynman paths, Yanming Che, Clemens Gneiting, and Franco Nori, Phys. Rev. B 105 (21) 214205, (2022), arXiv:2202.02750 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214205
160. Gradient Estimators for Normalizing Flows, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Acta Phys. Polon. B 55 (3) 3–A2, (2024), arXiv:2202.01314 doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.55.3-A2
161. Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo, Alexander G. D. G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet, (2022), arXiv:2201.13117
162. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
163. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
164. Neural network reconstruction of the dense matter equation of state from neutron star observables, Shriya Soma, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, Horst Stöcker, and Kai Zhou, JCAP 08 071, (2022), arXiv:2201.01756 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/071
165. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
166. Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, PoS LATTICE2021 059, (2022), arXiv:2112.15532 doi:10.22323/1.396.0059
167. Normalizing flows for the real-time sign problem, Yukari Yamauchi, and Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2021 621, (2022), arXiv:2112.15035 doi:10.22323/1.396.0621
168. Applying machine learning methods to prediction problems of lattice observables, Nikolai Gerasimeniuk, Maxim N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, D. L. Boyda, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, SciPost Phys. Proc. 6 020, (2022), arXiv:2112.07865 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.6.020
169. Neural quantum states for supersymmetric quantum gauge theories, Xizhi Han, and Enrico Rinaldi, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2112.05333
170. Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physics, Georgia Karagiorgi, Gregor Kasieczka, Scott Kravitz, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, (2021), arXiv:2112.03769
171. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
172. Reconstructing spectral functions via automatic differentiation, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) L051502, (2022), arXiv:2111.14760 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051502
173. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
174. Analysis of autocorrelation times in neural Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (1) 015303, (2023), arXiv:2111.10189 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.015303
175. How To Use Neural Networks To Investigate Quantum Many-Body Physics, Juan Carrasquilla, and Giacomo Torlai, PRXQuantum 2 (4) 040201, (2021), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040201
176. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
177. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
178. Direct sampling of projected entangled-pair states, Tom Vieijra, Jutho Haegeman, Frank Verstraete, and Laurens Vanderstraeten, Phys. Rev. B 104 (23) 235141, (2021), arXiv:2109.07356 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235141
179. Approaching nuclear interactions with lattice QCD, Marc Illa Subi\~na, (2021), arXiv:2109.10068
180. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
181. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
182. Latent Space Refinement for Deep Generative Models, Ramon Winterhalder, Marco Bellagente, and Benjamin Nachman, (2021), arXiv:2106.00792
183. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
184. Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows, Marylou Gabri\'e, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 (10) e2109420119, (2022), arXiv:2105.12603 doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119
185. Ab-initio study of interacting fermions at finite temperature with neural canonical transformation, Hao Xie, Linfeng Zhang, and Lei Wang, (2021), arXiv:2105.08644 doi:10.4208/jml.220113
186. Heavy quark potential in the quark-gluon plasma: Deep neural network meets lattice quantum chromodynamics, Shuzhe Shi, Kai Zhou, Jiaxing Zhao, Swagato Mukherjee, and Pengfei Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 105 (1) 014017, (2022), arXiv:2105.07862 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014017
187. Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (4) L042024, (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024
188. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
189. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
190. A.I. for nuclear physics, Paulo Bedaque, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (3) 100, (2021), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00290-x
191. Neural networks in quantum many-body physics: a hands-on tutorial, Juan Carrasquilla, and Giacomo Torlai, (2021), arXiv:2101.11099
192. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
193. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
194. Neural Network Study for 1+1d-Complex Scalar Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. A 1005 121847, (2021), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121847
195. Deep Learning and Neuromorphic Computing in Quantum Chromodynamics and Beyond, Lukas Kades, (2021), doi:10.11588/heidok.00030802
196. Generative Neural Samplers for the Quantum Heisenberg Chain, Johanna Vielhaben, and Nils Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. E 103 (6) 063304, (2021), arXiv:2012.10264 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.063304
197. Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01442
198. AI Poincar{\'e}: Machine Learning Conservation Laws from Trajectories, Ziming Liu, and Max Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (18) 180604, (2021), arXiv:2011.04698 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.180604
199. Quasi Anomalous Knowledge: Searching for new physics with embedded knowledge, Sang Eon Park, Dylan Rankin, Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Mikaeel Yunus, and Philip Harris, JHEP 21 030, (2020), arXiv:2011.03550 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)030
200. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
201. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
202. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
203. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
204. Neural resampler for Monte Carlo reweighting with preserved uncertainties, Benjamin Nachman, and Jesse Thaler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) 076004, (2020), arXiv:2007.11586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.076004
205. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
206. Report from the A.I. For Nuclear Physics Workshop, Paulo Bedaque, and others, (2020), arXiv:2006.05422
207. Quantum self-learning Monte Carlo and quantum-inspired Fourier transform sampler, Katsuhiro Endo, Taichi Nakamura, Keisuke Fujii, and Naoki Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (4) 043442, (2021), arXiv:2005.14075 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043442
208. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
209. Machine Learning for Quantum Matter, Juan Carrasquilla, Adv. Phys. X 5 (1) 1797528, (2020), arXiv:2003.11040 doi:10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528
210. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
211. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
212. Anomaly Detection with Density Estimation, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, Phys. Rev. D 101 075042, (2020), arXiv:2001.04990 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075042
213. Self-Supervised Learning of Generative Spin-Glasses with Normalizing Flows, Gavin S. Hartnett, and Masoud Mohseni, (2020), arXiv:2001.00585
214. A Probability Density Theory for Spin-Glass Systems, Gavin S. Hartnett, and Masoud Mohseni, (2020), arXiv:2001.00927
215. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2) 023304, (2020), arXiv:1910.13496 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
216. A guide for deploying Deep Learning in LHC searches: How to achieve optimality and account for uncertainty, Benjamin Nachman, SciPost Phys. 8 090, (2020), arXiv:1909.03081 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.6.090
217. Quantum tunnelling, real-time dynamics and Picard-Lefschetz thimbles, Zong-Gang Mou, Paul M. Saffin, and Anders Tranberg, JHEP 11 135, (2019), arXiv:1909.02488 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)135
218. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
219. Machine learning and the physical sciences, Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, and Lenka Zdeborov\'a, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045002, (2019), arXiv:1903.10563 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002
220. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73