1. Toward Manifest Relationality in Transformers via Symmetry Reduction, J. Fran\ccois, and L. Ravera, (2026), arXiv:2602.18948
2. Machine Learning, Javier M. Duarte, Uros Seljak, and Kazu Terao, (2025), arXiv:2512.11133
3. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
4. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
5. Search for Higgs boson production in association with a top quark-antiquark pair in the H{\textrightarrow}bb̅ decay channel and calibration of large-radius jet flavour taggers, Matteo Marchegiani, (2025), doi:10.3929/ethz-c-000788998
6. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
7. Learning Chern Numbers of Topological Insulators with Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Longde Huang, Oleksandr Balabanov, Hampus Linander, Mats Granath, Daniel Persson, and Jan E. Gerken, (2025), arXiv:2502.15376
8. Interpretability and explainability AI in advanced Neural Networks for Topological Quantum Field Theory and Medical Application, Tommaso Torda, (2024)
9. $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$~Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks: Benchmarking against Classical Neural Networks, Zhongtian Dong, and others, Axioms 13 (3) 188, (2024), arXiv:2311.18744 doi:10.3390/axioms13030188
10. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
11. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
12. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
13. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
14. Extracting the gamma-ray source-count distribution below the Fermi-LAT detection limit with deep learning, Aurelio Amerio, Alessandro Cuoco, and Nicolao Fornengo, JCAP 09 029, (2023), arXiv:2302.01947 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/09/029
15. Neural Network Gauge Field Transformation for 4D SU(3) gauge fields, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2023 040, (2023), arXiv:2405.19692
16. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
17. Snowmass 2021 Computational Frontier CompF03 Topical Group Report: Machine Learning, Phiala Shanahan, and others, (2022), arXiv:2209.07559
18. Detecting new physics as novelty {\textemdash} Complementarity matters, Xu-Hui Jiang, Aurelio Juste, Ying-Ying Li, and Tao Liu, JHEP 10 085, (2022), arXiv:2202.02165 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)085
19. Leveraging topology, geometry, and symmetries for efficient Machine Learning, Micha\"el Defferrard, (2022), doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-7398
20. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
21. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09001, (2022), arXiv:2112.12493 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809001
22. Generalization capabilities of neural networks in lattice applications, Matteo Favoni, Srinath Bulusu, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 400, (2022), arXiv:2112.12474 doi:10.22323/1.396.0400
23. Preserving gauge invariance in neural networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09004, (2022), arXiv:2112.11239 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809004
24. Lattice Gauge Symmetry in Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, PoS LATTICE2021 185, (2022), arXiv:2111.04389 doi:10.22323/1.396.0185
25. SPANet: Generalized permutationless set assignment for particle physics using symmetry preserving attention, Alexander Shmakov, Michael James Fenton, Ta-Wei Ho, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Daniel Whiteson, and Pierre Baldi, SciPost Phys. 12 (5) 178, (2022), arXiv:2106.03898 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.178
26. Machine Learning and Variational Algorithms for Lattice Field Theory, Gurtej Kanwar, (2021), arXiv:2106.01975
27. Symmetry-via-Duality: Invariant Neural Network Densities from Parameter-Space Correlators, Anindita Maiti, Keegan Stoner, and James Halverson, (2021), arXiv:2106.00694
28. Geometric Deep Learning and Equivariant Neural Networks, Jan E. Gerken, Jimmy Aronsson, Oscar Carlsson, Hampus Linander, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, and Daniel Persson, (2021), arXiv:2105.13926
29. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
30. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
31. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402
32. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
33. Nonlinear 3D Cosmic Web Simulation with Heavy-Tailed Generative Adversarial Networks, Richard M. Feder, Philippe Berger, and George Stein, Phys. Rev. D 102 (10) 103504, (2020), arXiv:2005.03050 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103504
34. Scrambling and decoding the charged quantum information, Junyu Liu, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 043164, (2020), arXiv:2003.11425 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043164
35. Complex Deep Learning with Quantum Optics, Antonio Manzalini, Quantum Rep. 1 (1) 107–118, (2019), doi:10.3390/quantum1010011
36. Covariance in Physics and Convolutional Neural Networks, Miranda C. N. Cheng, Vassilis Anagiannis, Maurice Weiler, Pim de Haan, Taco S. Cohen, and Max Welling, (2019), arXiv:1906.02481
37. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
38. Machine learning and the physical sciences, Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, and Lenka Zdeborov\'a, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045002, (2019), arXiv:1903.10563 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002