1. Current Status of Very-Large-Basis Hamiltonian Diagonalizations for Nuclear Physics, Calvin W. Johnson, 13th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics, (2018), arXiv:1809.07869
2. Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, E. Aprile, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (11) 111302, (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.111302
3. Present and projected sensitivities of Dark Matter direct detection experiments to effective WIMP-nucleus couplings, Sunghyun Kang, Stefano Scopel, Gaurav Tomar, and Jong-Hyun Yoon, Astropart. Phys. 109 50–68, (2019), arXiv:1805.06113 doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.02.006
4. BIGSTICK: A flexible configuration-interaction shell-model code (updated), Calvin W. Johnson, W. Erich Ormand, Kenneth S. McElvain, Ryan Zbikowski, and Hongzhang Shan, (2018), arXiv:1801.08432
5. Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the ATLAS detector, Morad Aaboud, and others, JHEP 01 126, (2018), arXiv:1711.03301 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)126
6. Current status of direct dark matter detection experiments, Jianglai Liu, Xun Chen, and Xiangdong Ji, Nature Phys. 13 (3) 212–216, (2017), arXiv:1709.00688 doi:10.1038/nphys4039
7. Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Xiangyi Cui, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 181302, (2017), arXiv:1708.06917 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181302
8. A combined analysis of PandaX, LUX, and XENON1T experiments within the framework of dark matter effective theory, Zuowei Liu, Yushan Su, Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Bingrong Yu, and Qiang Yuan, JHEP 11 024, (2017), arXiv:1708.04630 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)024
9. From quarks to nucleons in dark matter direct detection, Fady Bishara, Joachim Brod, Benjamin Grinstein, and Jure Zupan, JHEP 11 059, (2017), arXiv:1707.06998 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)059
10. First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, E. Aprile, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 181301, (2017), arXiv:1705.06655 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181301
11. Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, D. S. Akerib, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (25) 251302, (2017), arXiv:1705.03380 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.251302
12. Effective field theory search for high-energy nuclear recoils using the XENON100 dark matter detector, E. Aprile, and others, Phys. Rev. D 96 (4) 042004, (2017), arXiv:1705.02614 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.042004
13. Search for dark matter produced with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV, Albert M Sirunyan, and others, JHEP 07 014, (2017), arXiv:1703.01651 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)014
14. Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble Chamber, C. Amole, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (25) 251301, (2017), arXiv:1702.07666 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.251301
15. Spin-Dependent Weakly-Interacting-Massive-Particle{\textendash}Nucleon Cross Section Limits from First Data of PandaX-II Experiment, Changbo Fu, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (7) 071301, (2017), arXiv:1611.06553 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.071301
16. XENON100 Dark Matter Results from a Combination of 477 Live Days, E. Aprile, and others, Phys. Rev. D 94 (12) 122001, (2016), arXiv:1609.06154 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.122001
17. Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, D. S. Akerib, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2) 021303, (2017), arXiv:1608.07648 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021303
18. Improved dark matter search results from PICO-2L Run 2, C. Amole, and others, Phys. Rev. D 93 (6) 061101, (2016), arXiv:1601.03729 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.061101
19. Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry, M. G. Aartsen, and others, JCAP 04 022, (2016), arXiv:1601.00653 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/022
20. Dark matter search results from the PICO-60 CF$_3$I bubble chamber, C. Amole, and others, Phys. Rev. D 93 (5) 052014, (2016), arXiv:1510.07754 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.052014
21. Chiral power counting of one- and two-body currents in direct detection of dark matter, Martin Hoferichter, Philipp Klos, and Achim Schwenk, Phys. Lett. B 746 410–416, (2015), arXiv:1503.04811 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.041
22. Search for neutrinos from annihilation of captured low-mass dark matter particles in the Sun by Super-Kamiokande, K. Choi, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (14) 141301, (2015), arXiv:1503.04858 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.141301
23. Dark matter effective field theory scattering in direct detection experiments, K. Schneck, and others, Phys. Rev. D 91 (9) 092004, (2015), arXiv:1503.03379 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.092004
24. A Global Analysis of Light and Charge Yields in Liquid Xenon, Brian Lenardo, Kareem Kazkaz, Aaron Manalaysay, Jeremy Mock, Matthew Szydagis, and Mani Tripathi, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62 (6) 3387–3396, (2015), arXiv:1412.4417 doi:10.1109/TNS.2015.2481322
25. Nuclear structure aspects of spin-independent WIMP scattering off xenon, L. Vietze, P. Klos, J. Men\'endez, W. C. Haxton, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D 91 (4) 043520, (2015), arXiv:1412.6091 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043520
26. Supersymmetric dark matter in the harsh light of the Large Hadron Collider, Michael E. Peskin, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112 (40) 12256–12263, (2014), doi:10.1073/pnas.1308787111
27. Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering response, Nikhil Anand, A. Liam Fitzpatrick, and W. C. Haxton, Phys. Rev. C 89 (6) 065501, (2014), arXiv:1308.6288 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.065501
28. Enhancement of NEST Capabilities for Simulating Low-Energy Recoils in Liquid Xenon, Matthew Szydagis, Adalyn Fyhrie, Daniel Thorngren, and Mani Tripathi, JINST 8 C10003, (2013), arXiv:1307.6601 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/10/C10003
29. Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents, P. Klos, J. Men\'endez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D 88 (8) 083516, (2013), arXiv:1304.7684 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083516
30. The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection, A. Liam Fitzpatrick, Wick Haxton, Emanuel Katz, Nicholas Lubbers, and Yiming Xu, JCAP 02 004, (2013), arXiv:1203.3542 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/004
31. Asymmetric Dark Matter and Effective Operators, Matthew R. Buckley, Phys. Rev. D 84 043510, (2011), arXiv:1104.1429 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.043510
32. Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JiJi Fan, Matthew Reece, and Lian-Tao Wang, JCAP 11 042, (2010), arXiv:1008.1591 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/11/042
33. Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection, Jonathan L. Feng, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 495–545, (2010), arXiv:1003.0904 doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659
34. Disassembling the Nuclear Matrix Elements of the Neutrinoless beta beta Decay, J. Menendez, A. Poves, E. Caurier, and F. Nowacki, Nucl. Phys. A 818 139–151, (2009), arXiv:0801.3760 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.12.005
35. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Gianfranco Bertone, Dan Hooper, and Joseph Silk, Phys. Rept. 405 279–390, (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031
36. Presentation of search results: The $CL_s$ technique, Alexander L. Read, J. Phys. G 28 2693–2704, (2002), doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313
37. Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Thomas Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 435–443, (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9902006 doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2
38. Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, J. D. Lewin, and P. F. Smith, Astropart. Phys. 6 87–112, (1996), doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(96)00047-3
39. Nuclear physics of dark matter detection, J. Engel, S. Pittel, and P. Vogel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1 1–37, (1992), doi:10.1142/S0218301392000023