1. Machine Learning Topological Invariants with Neural Networks, Pengfei Zhang, Huitao Shen, and Hui Zhai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (6) 066401, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.066401
  2. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
  3. Lattice QCD input for nuclear structure and reactions, Zohreh Davoudi, EPJ Web Conf. 175 01022, (2018), arXiv:1711.02020 doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817501022
  4. Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions, Kelvin Ch\textquoterightng, Juan Carrasquilla, Roger G. Melko, and Ehsan Khatami, Phys. Rev. X 7 (3) 031038, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031038
  5. Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, Phys. Rev. B 96 (18) 184410, (2017), arXiv:1705.05582 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410
  6. Applications of neural networks to the studies of phase transitions of two-dimensional Potts models, Chian-De Li, Deng-Ruei Tan, and Fu-Jiun Jiang, Annals Phys. 391 312–331, (2018), arXiv:1703.02369 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.018
  7. Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines, Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. E 96 (5) 051301, (2017), arXiv:1702.08586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301
  8. Self-learning Monte Carlo method, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (4) 041101, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101
  9. Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. B 95 (3) 035105, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105
  10. Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning, Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. B 94 (19) 195105, (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.195105
  11. Learning thermodynamics with Boltzmann machines, Giacomo Torlai, and Roger G. Melko, Phys. Rev. B 94 (16) 165134, (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165134
  12. Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics, S. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2) 112, (2017), arXiv:1607.00299 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4509-7
  13. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks, Giuseppe Carleo, and Matthias Troyer, Science 355 (6325) 602–606, (2017), arXiv:1606.02318 doi:10.1126/science.aag2302
  14. Multiscale Monte Carlo equilibration: Two-color QCD with two fermion flavors, William Detmold, and Michael G. Endres, Phys. Rev. D 94 (11) 114502, (2016), arXiv:1605.09650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114502
  15. Machine learning phases of matter, Juan Carrasquilla, and Roger G. Melko, Nature Phys. 13 431–434, (2017), arXiv:1605.01735 doi:10.1038/nphys4035
  16. Recent progress in hadron structure from Lattice QCD, Martha Constantinou, PoS CD15 009, (2015), arXiv:1511.00214 doi:10.22323/1.253.0009
  17. Multiscale Monte Carlo equilibration: Pure Yang-Mills theory, Michael G. Endres, Richard C. Brower, William Detmold, Kostas Orginos, and Andrew V. Pochinsky, Phys. Rev. D 92 (11) 114516, (2015), arXiv:1510.04675 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114516
  18. Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD, Heng-Tong Ding, Frithjof Karsch, and Swagato Mukherjee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24 (10) 1530007, (2015), arXiv:1504.05274 doi:10.1142/S0218301315300076
  19. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2014), arXiv:1412.6980
  20. Dark nuclei. II. Nuclear spectroscopy in two-color QCD, William Detmold, Matthew McCullough, and Andrew Pochinsky, Phys. Rev. D 90 (11) 114506, (2014), arXiv:1406.4116 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.114506
  21. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Nitish Srivastava, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan R. Salakhutdinov, (2012), arXiv:1207.0580
  22. Light Asymmetric Dark Matter on the Lattice: SU(2) Technicolor with Two Fundamental Flavors, Randy Lewis, Claudio Pica, and Francesco Sannino, Phys. Rev. D 85 014504, (2012), arXiv:1109.3513 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014504
  23. Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, Nucl. Phys. B 845 93–119, (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020
  24. Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, Martin Lüscher, JHEP 08 071, (2010), arXiv:1006.4518 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071
  25. Nuclear Physics from Lattice QCD, S. R. Beane, W. Detmold, K. Orginos, and M. J. Savage, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66 1–40, (2011), arXiv:1004.2935 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2010.08.002
  26. Computational Strategies in Lattice QCD, Martin Luscher, Les Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing 331–399, (2010), arXiv:1002.4232
  27. Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice, Christof Gattringer, and Christian B. Lang, 788, (2010), doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3
  28. I = 2 pi-pi scattering from fully-dynamical mixed-action lattice QCD, Silas R. Beane, Paulo F. Bedaque, Kostas Orginos, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 73 054503, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0506013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.054503
  29. Lattice QCD with mixed actions, K. C. Bowler, B. Joo, R. D. Kenway, C. M. Maynard, and R. J. Tweedie, JHEP 08 003, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0411005 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/08/003
  30. The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Robert G. Edwards, and Balint Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 832, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409003 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254
  31. Moments of nucleon spin dependent generalized parton distributions, W. Schroers, and others, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 129 907–909, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0309065 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02750-6
  32. Perfect actions: From the theoretical background to recent developments, P. Hasenfratz, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 131 189–231, (1998), doi:10.1143/PTPS.131.189
  33. Multigrid Monte Carlo algorithms for SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Two-dimensions versus four-dimensions, Martin Grabenstein, and Klaus Pinn, Phys. Rev. D 50 6998–7010, (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9406013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6998
  34. Perfect lattice action for asymptotically free theories, P. Hasenfratz, and F. Niedermayer, Nucl. Phys. B 414 785–814, (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9308004 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90261-5
  35. Fixed point actions for Wilson fermions, U. J. Wiese, Phys. Lett. B 315 417–424, (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9306003 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91634-Y
  36. Lattice Gauge Theories : An Introduction (Fourth Edition), Heinz J. Rothe, 43, (2012), doi:10.1142/8229
  37. Multigrid Monte Carlo. 3. Two-dimensional 0(4) symmetric nonlinear sigma model, Robert G. Edwards, Sabino Jose Ferreira, Jonathan Goodman, and Alan D. Sokal, Nucl. Phys. B 380 621–664, (1992), arXiv:hep-lat/9112002 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90262-A
  38. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy, J. Lin, IEEE Trans. Info. Theor. 37 (1) 145–151, (1991), doi:10.1109/18.61115
  39. Multigrid Monte Carlo. 2. Two-dimensional XY model, Robert G. Edwards, Jonathan Goodman, and Alan D. Sokal, Nucl. Phys. B 354 289–327, (1991), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90357-4
  40. Block Renormalization Group for Euclidean Fermions, T. Balaban, M. O'Carroll, and R. Schor, Commun. Math. Phys. 122 233–247, (1989), doi:10.1007/BF01257414
  41. The Pivot algorithm: a highly efficient Monte Carlo method for selfavoiding walk, Neal Madras, and Alan D. Sokal, J. Statist. Phys. 50 109–186, (1988), doi:10.1007/BF01022990
  42. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
  43. Multigrid Monte Carlo Method for Lattice Field Theories, J. Goodman, and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1015–1018, (1986), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1015
  44. Representations of the Rotation Reflection Symmetry Group of the Four-dimensional Cubic Lattice, Jeffrey E. Mandula, George Zweig, and Jan Govaerts, Nucl. Phys. B 228 91–108, (1983), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90399-1
  45. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position, Kunihiko Fukushima, Biol. Cyber. 36 (4) 193–202, (1980), doi:10.1007/BF00344251
  46. Finite-lattice approximations to renormalization groups, Thomas L. Bell, and Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 11 (9) 3431, (1975), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.11.3431
  47. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
  48. Measurement of the pi- p elastic scattering cross-section near 180 degrees between 600 and 1280 mev/c, T. J. Richards, D. G. Crabb, R. Keller, J. R. O' Fallon, R. J. Ott, J. Trischuk, J. Va'vra, and L. S. Schroeder, Phys. Rev. D 10 45–64, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.45
  49. The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, K. G. Wilson, and John B. Kogut, Phys. Rept. 12 75–199, (1974), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4
  50. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694