1. Introduction to Lattice Field Theory, Ra\'ul A. Brice\~no, (2025), arXiv:2512.22368
2. Efficient Learning of Lattice Gauge Theories with Fermions, Shreya Shukla, Yukari Yamauchi, Andrey Y. Lokhov, Scott Lawrence, and Abhijith Jayakumar, (2025), arXiv:2512.19891
3. Reinforcement Learning Techniques for the Flavor Problem in Particle Physics, Alessio Giarnetti, and Davide Meloni, Symmetry 18 (1) 131, (2026), arXiv:2510.25495 doi:10.3390/sym18010131
4. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories, Matteo Favoni, (2025), arXiv:2506.12493 doi:10.34726/hss.2025.89161
5. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
6. Aspects of propagator sparsening in lattice QCD, Sam Christian, and William Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) 114514, (2025), arXiv:2501.05404 doi:10.1103/xfmp-c2d4
7. Physics-driven learning for inverse problems in quantum chromodynamics, Gert Aarts, Kenji Fukushima, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Andreas Ipp, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (3) 154–163, (2025), arXiv:2501.05580 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00798-x
8. Building imaginary-time thermal field theory with artificial neural networks*, Tian Xu, Lingxiao Wang, Lianyi He, Kai Zhou, and Yin Jiang, Chin. Phys. C 48 (10) 103101, (2024), arXiv:2405.10493 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad5f80
9. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
10. $\Sigma$ Resonances from a Neural Network-based Partial Wave Analysis on $K^-p$ Scattering, Jun Shi, Long-Cheng Gui, Jian Liang, and Guoming Liu, (2023), arXiv:2305.01852
11. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
12. Detection of Berezinskii{\textendash}Kosterlitz{\textendash}Thouless transitions for the two-dimensional q-state clock models with neural networks, Yaun-Heng Tseng, and Fu-Jiun Jiang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 (12) 1118, (2023), arXiv:2303.00439 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04741-4
13. The Compton Amplitude from the Lattice Feynman-Hellmann Method, Alec Hannaford Gunn, (2023)
14. Machine learning phases of an Abelian gauge theory, Jhao-Hong Peng, Yuan-Heng Tseng, and Fu-Jiun Jiang, PTEP 2023 (7) 073A03, (2023), arXiv:2212.14655 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptad096
15. Compact QED: the photon propagator, confinement and positivity violation for the pure gauge theory, Orlando Oliveira, Lee C. Loveridge, and Paulo J. Silva, EPJ Web Conf. 274 02004, (2022), arXiv:2211.12593 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227402004
16. Untitled, Yu Lu, Yi-Jia Wang, Ying Chen, and Jia-Jun Wu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (7) 073101, (2024), arXiv:2210.02184 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad3b9c
17. Predicting the masses of exotic hadrons with data augmentation using multilayer perceptron, Huseyin Bahtiyar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38 (01) 2350003, (2023), arXiv:2208.09538 doi:10.1142/S0217751X23500033
18. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
19. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
20. Variational Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories, Paolo Stornati, (2022), doi:10.18452/24304
21. A universal training scheme and the resulting universality for machine learning phases, Yuan-Heng Tseng, Fu-Jiun Jiang, and C. -Y. Huang, PTEP 2023 (1) 013A03, (2023), arXiv:2205.03061 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac173
22. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
23. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
24. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
25. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, EPJ Web Conf. 258 09001, (2022), arXiv:2112.12493 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225809001
26. Translating Neutron Star Observations to Nuclear Symmetry Energy via Deep Neural Networks, Plamen G. Krastev, Galaxies 10 (1) 16, (2022), arXiv:2112.04089 doi:10.3390/galaxies10010016
27. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
28. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
29. Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD, S. -Y. Chen, H. -T. Ding, F. -Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. -B. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2110.13521
30. Berezinskii{\textendash}Kosterlitz{\textendash}Thouless transition {\textendash} A universal neural network study with benchmarks, Y. -H. Tseng, and F. -J. Jiang, Results Phys. 33 105134, (2022), arXiv:2110.01344 doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105134
31. Optimizing multilayer Bayesian neural networks for evaluation of fission yields, Zi-Ao Wang, and Junchen Pei, Phys. Rev. C 104 (6) 064608, (2021), arXiv:2106.11746 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.064608
32. Machine learning based approach to fluid dynamics, Kirill Taradiy, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, Roman V. Poberezhnyuk, Volodymyr Vovchenko, and Horst Stoecker, (2021), arXiv:2106.02841
33. Modern Machine Learning and Particle Physics, Matthew D. Schwartz, (2021), arXiv:2103.12226 doi:10.1162/99608f92.beeb1183
34. A.I. for nuclear physics, Paulo Bedaque, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (3) 100, (2021), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00290-x
35. A universal neural network for learning phases, D. -R Tan, J. -H Peng, Y. -H Tseng, and F. -J Jiang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (11) 1116, (2021), arXiv:2103.10846 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02121-4
36. Bayesian evaluation of charge yields of fission fragments of $^{239}$U, C. Y. Qiao, J. C. Pei, Z. A. Wang, Y. Qiang, Y. J. Chen, N. C. Shu, and Z. G. Ge, Phys. Rev. C 103 (3) 034621, (2021), arXiv:2102.09314 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034621
37. Quantum field-theoretic machine learning, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074510, (2021), arXiv:2102.09449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074510
38. Neural Network Study for 1+1d-Complex Scalar Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. A 1005 121847, (2021), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121847
39. Deep Learning and Neuromorphic Computing in Quantum Chromodynamics and Beyond, Lukas Kades, (2021), doi:10.11588/heidok.00030802
40. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
41. Generative Model Study for 1+1d-Complex Scalar Field Theory, Kai Zhou, Gergely Endrodi, Long-Gang Pang, and Horst Stöcker, PoS AISIS2019 007, (2020), doi:10.22323/1.372.0007
42. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
43. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
44. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
45. Machine learning phases and criticalities without using real data for training, D. R. Tan, and F. J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. B 102 (22) 224434, (2020), arXiv:2007.14809 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.224434
46. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
47. Report from the A.I. For Nuclear Physics Workshop, Paulo Bedaque, and others, (2020), arXiv:2006.05422
48. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
49. Towards the spectral properties and phase structure of QCD., Nicolas Wink, (2020), doi:10.11588/heidok.00028503
50. A comprehensive neural networks study of the phase transitions of Potts model, D. -R. Tan, C. -D. Li, W. -P. Zhu, and F. -J. Jiang, New J. Phys. 22 (6) 063016, (2020), arXiv:1912.12042 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab8ab4
51. Identifying the nature of the QCD transition in relativistic collision of heavy nuclei with deep learning, Yi-Lun Du, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, Long-Gang Pang, Anton Motornenko, Hong-Shi Zong, Xin-Nian Wang, and Horst Stöcker, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (6) 516, (2020), arXiv:1910.11530 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8030-7
52. Machine learning and serving of discrete field theories, Hong Qin, Sci. Rep. 10 (1) 19329, (2020), arXiv:1910.10147 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76301-0
53. Decoding quantum field theory with machine learning, Daniel Grimmer, Irene Melgarejo-Lermas, Jos\'e Polo-G\'omez, and Eduardo Mart\'\in-Mart\'\inez, JHEP 08 031, (2023), arXiv:1910.03637 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)031
54. Classifying topological charge in SU(3) Yang{\textendash}Mills theory with machine learning, Takuya Matsumoto, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and Yasuhiro Kohno, PTEP 2021 (2) 023D01, (2021), arXiv:1909.06238 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa138
55. Scattering meson and baryon resonances in lattice QCD, Srijit Paul, (2019), doi:10.25926/h3jk-fe50
56. Neural-network Quantum State of Transverse-field Ising Model, Han-qing Shi, Xiao-yue Sun, and Ding-fang Zeng, Commun. Theor. Phys. 71 (11) 1379, (2019), arXiv:1905.11066 doi:10.1088/0253-6102/71/11/1379
57. Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M. Urban, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P. G. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) 096001, (2020), arXiv:1905.04305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001
58. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
59. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
60. Machine learning and the physical sciences, Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, and Lenka Zdeborov\'a, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045002, (2019), arXiv:1903.10563 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002
61. Phase transitions in lattice gauge theories: From the numerical sign problem to machine learning, Manuel Scherzer, (2019), doi:10.11588/heidok.00026601
62. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
63. Digitizing Gauge Fields: Lattice Monte Carlo Results for Future Quantum Computers, Daniel C. Hackett, Kiel Howe, Ciaran Hughes, William Jay, Ethan T. Neil, and James N. Simone, Phys. Rev. A 99 (6) 062341, (2019), arXiv:1811.03629 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341
64. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
65. Examples of renormalization group transformations for image sets, Samuel Foreman, Joel Giedt, Yannick Meurice, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. E 98 (5) 052129, (2018), arXiv:1807.10250 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.98.052129
66. Machine Learning Estimators for Lattice QCD Observables, Boram Yoon, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Rajan Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 014504, (2019), arXiv:1807.05971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014504
67. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists, Pankaj Mehta, Marin Bukov, Ching-Hao Wang, Alexandre G. R. Day, Clint Richardson, Charles K. Fisher, and David J. Schwab, Phys. Rept. 810 1–124, (2019), arXiv:1803.08823 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.03.001