1. Stochastic automatic differentiation and the signal to noise problem, Guilherme Catumba, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (9) 1037, (2025), arXiv:2502.15570 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14690-0
2. Black-box unadjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Jakob Robnik, Reuben Cohn-Gordon, and Uro\vs Seljak, (2024), arXiv:2412.08876
3. Taming NSPT fluctuations in O(N) Non-Linear Sigma Model: simulations in the large N regime, Paolo Baglioni, and Francesco Di Renzo, PoS EuroPLEx2023 030, (2024), arXiv:2412.02624 doi:10.22323/1.451.0030
4. FLAG review 2024, Y. Aoki, and others, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) 014508, (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn
5. Perturbative gradient flow coupling of the twisted Eguchi{\textendash}Kawai model with the numerical stochastic perturbation theory, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Masanori Okawa, and Hironori Takei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40 (06) 2550013, (2025), arXiv:2410.15668 doi:10.1142/S0217751X25500137
6. Strong CP problem in the quantum rotor, David Albandea, Guilherme Catumba, and Alberto Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 110 (9) 094512, (2024), arXiv:2402.17518 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094512
7. Large fluctuations in NSPT computations: a lesson from O(N) non-linear sigma models, Paolo Baglioni, and Francesco Di Renzo, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2) 220, (2025), arXiv:2402.01322 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13887-7
8. The dependence of observables on action parameters, Guilherme Catumba, Alberto Ramos, and Bryan Zaldivar, PoS LATTICE2023 020, (2024), arXiv:2401.06456 doi:10.22323/1.453.0020
9. Short-flow-time expansion of quark bilinears through next-to-next-to-leading order QCD, Janosch Borgulat, Robert V. Harlander, Jonas T. Kohnen, and Fabian Lange, JHEP 05 179, (2024), arXiv:2311.16799 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)179
10. Stochastic automatic differentiation for Monte Carlo processes, Guilherme Catumba, Alberto Ramos, and Bryan Zaldivar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 307 109396, (2025), arXiv:2307.15406 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109396
11. Quantum electrodynamics on the lattice and numerical perturbative computation of g {\ensuremath{-}} 2, Ryuichiro Kitano, and Hiromasa Takaura, PTEP 2023 (10) 103B02, (2023), arXiv:2210.05569 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptad125
12. Determination of $\alpha _s(m_Z)$ by the non-perturbative decoupling method, Mattia Dalla Brida, Roman Höllwieser, Francesco Knechtli, Tomasz Korzec, Alessandro Nada, Alberto Ramos, Stefan Sint, and Rainer Sommer, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (12) 1092, (2022), arXiv:2209.14204 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10998-3
13. Perturbative study of large N principal chiral model with twisted reduction, Antonio Gonz\'alez-Arroyo, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yingbo Ji, and Masanori Okawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (36) 2250210, (2022), arXiv:2208.01867 doi:10.1142/S0217751X22502104
14. Bootstrap for lattice Yang-Mills theory, Vladimir Kazakov, and Zechuan Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051501, (2023), arXiv:2203.11360 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051501
15. FLAG Review 2021, Y. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) 869, (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1
16. Applications of the Perturbative Gradient Flow, Fabian Lange, SciPost Phys. Proc. 7 033, (2022), arXiv:2110.06854 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.7.033
17. Applications of the perturbative gradient flow at higher orders in quantum chromodynamics, Fabian Lange, (2021), doi:10.18154/RWTH-2021-07652
18. Past, present, and future of precision determinations of the QCD parameters from lattice QCD, Mattia Dalla Brida, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2) 66, (2021), arXiv:2012.01232 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00381-3
19. An analysis of systematic effects in finite size scaling studies using the gradient flow, Alessandro Nada, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (1) 1, (2021), arXiv:2007.12862 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08759-1
20. Short flow-time coefficients of $CP$-violating operators, Matthew D. Rizik, Christopher J. Monahan, and Andrea Shindler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (3) 034509, (2020), arXiv:2005.04199 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034509
21. Volume (in)dependence in Yang-Mills theories, Eduardo Iba\~nez Bribi\'an, (2019)
22. Probing large-order perturbative expansions in lattice gauge theories with fermions, Gianluca Filaci, (2019)
23. openQ*D code: a versatile tool for QCD+QED simulations, Isabel Campos, Patrick Fritzsch, Martin Hansen, Marina Krstic Marinkovic, Agostino Patella, Alberto Ramos, and Nazario Tantalo, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (3) 195, (2020), arXiv:1908.11673 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7617-3
24. Universal Renormalons in Principal Chiral Models, Falk Bruckmann, and Matthias Puhr, Phys. Rev. D 101 (3) 034513, (2020), arXiv:1906.09471 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034513
25. The gradient flow coupling at high-energy and the scale of SU(3) Yang{\textendash}Mills theory, Mattia Dalla Brida, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (8) 720, (2019), arXiv:1905.05147 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7228-z
26. Perturbative renormalization of hadron operators and other fundamental quantities in lattice quantum chromodynamics, Gregoris K. Spanoudes, (2019)
27. Results and techniques for higher order calculations within the gradient-flow formalism, Johannes Artz, Robert V. Harlander, Fabian Lange, Tobias Neumann, and Mario Prausa, JHEP 06 121, (2019), arXiv:1905.00882 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)121
28. The twisted gradient flow coupling at one loop, Eduardo I. Bribian, and Margarita Garcia Perez, JHEP 03 200, (2019), arXiv:1903.08029 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)200
29. Numerical stochastic perturbation theory applied to the twisted Eguchi-Kawai model, Antonio Gonz\'alez-Arroyo, Issaku Kanamori, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Kanata Miyahana, Masanori Okawa, and Ryoichiro Ueno, JHEP 06 127, (2019), arXiv:1902.09847 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)127
30. FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), S. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) 113, (2020), arXiv:1902.08191 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7
31. Precision Determination of $\alpha_s$ from Lattice QCD, Mattia Dalla Brida, Universe 4 (12) 148, (2018), arXiv:1812.06692 doi:10.3390/universe4120148
32. The perturbative SU(N) one-loop running coupling in the twisted gradient flow scheme, Eduardo Ibanez Bribian, and Margarita Garcia Perez, PoS LATTICE2018 246, (2018), arXiv:1810.12822 doi:10.22323/1.334.0246
33. The two-loop energy{\textendash}momentum tensor within the gradient-flow formalism, Robert V. Harlander, Yannick Kluth, and Fabian Lange, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (11) 944, (2018), arXiv:1808.09837 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6415-7
34. Numerical stochastic perturbation theory estimate of the improvement coefficient $c_A$ to two loops, Christian Torrero, Phys. Rev. D 99 (1) 014517, (2019), arXiv:1807.11616 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014517
35. Large-order NSPT for lattice gauge theories with fermions: the plaquette in massless QCD, Luigi Del Debbio, Francesco Di Renzo, and Gianluca Filaci, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (11) 974, (2018), arXiv:1807.09518 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6458-9
36. Dynamics of numerical stochastic perturbation theory, Marco Garofalo, (2018)
37. A non-perturbative exploration of the high energy regime in $N_{\mathrm{f}}=3$ QCD, Mattia Dalla Brida, Patrick Fritzsch, Tomasz Korzec, Alberto Ramos, Stefan Sint, and Rainer Sommer, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (5) 372, (2018), arXiv:1803.10230 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5838-5
38. Stochastic locality and master-field simulations of very large lattices, Martin Lüscher, EPJ Web Conf. 175 01002, (2018), arXiv:1707.09758 doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817501002
39. Investigation of New Methods for Numerical Stochastic Perturbation Theory in $\varphi^4$ Theory, Mattia Dalla Brida, Marco Garofalo, and A. D. Kennedy, Phys. Rev. D 96 (5) 054502, (2017), arXiv:1703.04406 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.054502