Threshold expansion of the three-particle quantization condition

INSPIRE: 1418823
arXiv: 1602.00324
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.096006

Authors: Hansen, Maxwell T., Sharpe, Stephen R.

Submitted: 31 January 2016

Subjects:

Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D 93 (9) 096006 (2016)

Citations: 98

Abstract

We recently derived a quantization condition for the energy of three relativistic particles in a cubic box [M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Rev. D 90, 116003 (2014); M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114509 (2015)]. Here we use this condition to study the energy level closest to the three-particle threshold when the total three-momentum vanishes. We expand this energy in powers of 1/L, where L is the linear extent of the finite volume. The expansion begins at O(1/L3), and we determine the coefficients of the terms through O(1/L6). As is also the case for the two-particle threshold energy, the 1/L3, 1/L4 and 1/L5 coefficients depend only on the two-particle scattering length a. These can be compared to previous results obtained using nonrelativistic quantum mechanics [K. Huang and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 105, 767 (1957); S. R. Beane, W. Detmold, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074507 (2007); S. Tan, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013636 (2008)], and we find complete agreement. The 1/L6 coefficients depend additionally on the two-particle effective range r (just as in the two-particle case) and on a suitably defined threshold three-particle scattering amplitude (a new feature for three particles). A second new feature in the three-particle case is that logarithmic dependence on L appears at O(1/L6). Relativistic effects enter at this order, and the only comparison possible with the nonrelativistic result is for the coefficient of the logarithm, where we again find agreement. For a more thorough check of the 1/L6 result, and thus of the quantization condition, we also compare to a perturbative calculation of the threshold energy in relativistic λϕ4 theory, which we have recently presented in [M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014506 (2016)]. Here, all terms can be compared, and we find full agreement.