# $K\_L\-K\_S$ Mass Difference from Lattice QCD

**INSPIRE:** [1299144](https://inspirehep.net/literature/1299144)
**arXiv:** [1406\.0916](https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0916)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevLett\.113\.112003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.112003)

**Authors:** Bai, Z\., Christ, N\.H\., Izubuchi, T\., Sachrajda, C\.T\., Soni, A\., Yu, J\.

**Submitted:** 3 June 2014

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP
- Other

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.Lett\. 113 112003 \(2014\)

**Citations:** 123

## Abstract

\<p\>We report on the first complete calculation of the \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:msub\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>K\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>L\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msub\>\<mml:mo\>\-\</mml:mo\>\<mml:msub\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>K\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>S\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msub\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> mass difference, \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mml:mi\>\<mml:msub\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>M\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>K\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msub\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\>, using lattice QCD\. The calculation is performed on a \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mn\>2\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mo\>\+\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>1\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> flavor, domain wall fermion ensemble with a 330 MeV pion mass and a 575 MeV kaon mass\. We use a quenched charm quark with a 949 MeV mass to implement Glashow\-Iliopoulos\-Maiani cancellation\. For these heavier\-than\-physical particle masses, we obtain \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mml:mi\>\<mml:msub\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>M\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>K\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msub\>\<mml:mo\>\=\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mspace linebreak\="goodbreak"/\>\<mml:mn\>3\.19\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>41\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>96\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mo\>×\</mml:mo\>\<mml:msup\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mn\>10\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo\>\-\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>12\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msup\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mi\>MeV\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\>, quite similar to the experimental value\. Here the first error is statistical, and the second is an estimate of the systematic discretization error\. An interesting aspect of this calculation is the importance of the disconnected diagrams, a dramatic failure of the Okubo\-Zweig\-Iizuka rule\.\</p\>