# Nonperturbative renormalization of overlap quark bilinears on 2\+1\-flavor domain wall fermion configurations

**INSPIRE:** [1275624](https://inspirehep.net/literature/1275624)
**arXiv:** [1312\.7628](https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7628)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.90\.034505](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034505)

**Authors:** Liu, Zhaofeng, Chen, Ying, Dong, Shao\-Jing, Glatzmaier, Michael, Gong, Ming, Li, Anyi, Liu, Keh\-Fei, Yang, Yi\-Bo, Zhang, Jian\-Bo

**Submitted:** 30 December 2013

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP
- Other

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 90 \(3\) 034505 \(2014\)

**Citations:** 30

## Abstract

\<p\>We present renormalization constants of overlap quark bilinear operators on \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mn\>2\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mo\>\+\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>1\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\>\-flavor domain wall fermion configurations\. This setup is being used by the \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>χ\</mml:mi\>\<mml:mi\>QCD\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> Collaboration in calculations of physical quantities such as strangeness in the nucleon and the strange and charm quark masses\. The scale\-independent renormalization constant for the axial\-vector current is computed using the Ward identity\. The renormalization constants for scalar, pseudoscalar, and vector currents are calculated in the RI\-MOM scheme\. Results in the \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mover accent\="true"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>MS\</mml:mi\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo accent\="true" stretchy\="true"\>¯\</mml:mo\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:mover\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> scheme are also given\. The step scaling function of quark masses in the RI\-MOM scheme is computed as well\. The analysis uses, in total, six different ensembles of three sea quarks, each on two lattices with sizes \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:msup\>\<mml:mn\>24\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mn\>3\</mml:mn\>\</mml:msup\>\<mml:mo\>×\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>64\</mml:mn\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> and \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:msup\>\<mml:mn\>32\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mn\>3\</mml:mn\>\</mml:msup\>\<mml:mo\>×\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>64\</mml:mn\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> at spacings \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mi\>a\</mml:mi\>\<mml:mo\>\=\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>1\.73\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mi\>GeV\</mml:mi\>\<mml:msup\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mml:mo\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo\>\-\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>1\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msup\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\> and \<inline\-formula\>\<mml:math display\="inline"\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>2\.28\</mml:mn\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mtext\> \</mml:mtext\>\<mml:mi\>GeV\</mml:mi\>\<mml:msup\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mml:mo\>\</mml:mrow\>\<mml:mrow\>\<mml:mo\>\-\</mml:mo\>\<mml:mn\>1\</mml:mn\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:msup\>\</mml:mrow\>\</mml:math\>\</inline\-formula\>, respectively\.\</p\>