Nonperturbative renormalization of overlap quark bilinears on 2+1-flavor domain wall fermion configurations

INSPIRE: 1275624
arXiv: 1312.7628
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034505

Authors: Liu, Zhaofeng, Chen, Ying, Dong, Shao-Jing, Glatzmaier, Michael, Gong, Ming, Li, Anyi, Liu, Keh-Fei, Yang, Yi-Bo, Zhang, Jian-Bo

Submitted: 30 December 2013

Subjects:

Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D 90 (3) 034505 (2014)

Citations: 30

Abstract

<p>We present renormalization constants of overlap quark bilinear operators on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-flavor domain wall fermion configurations. This setup is being used by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>QCD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Collaboration in calculations of physical quantities such as strangeness in the nucleon and the strange and charm quark masses. The scale-independent renormalization constant for the axial-vector current is computed using the Ward identity. The renormalization constants for scalar, pseudoscalar, and vector currents are calculated in the RI-MOM scheme. Results in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true" stretchy="true">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scheme are also given. The step scaling function of quark masses in the RI-MOM scheme is computed as well. The analysis uses, in total, six different ensembles of three sea quarks, each on two lattices with sizes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> at spacings <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.73</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.28</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>