# Reply to arXiv:1211\.3957 and arXiv:1211\.4731 by Leader et al\. and arXiv:1212\.0761 by Harindranath et al

**INSPIRE:** [1226829](https://inspirehep.net/literature/1226829)
**arXiv:** [1304\.1009](https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1009)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevLett\.111\.039103](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.039103)

**Authors:** Ji, Xiangdong, Xiong, Xiaonu, Yuan, Feng

**Submitted:** 3 April 2013

**Subjects:**
- hep\-ph
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.Lett\. 111 039103 \(2013\)

**Citations:** 14

## Abstract

We reply to the recent comments on our published papers, Phys\. Rev\. Lett\. 109 \(2012\) 152005 and Phys\. Lett\. B717 \(2012\) 214\. We point out that the criticisms about the transverse polarization parton sum rule we obtained are invalid\.