# Neutral B\-meson mixing from unquenched lattice QCD with domain\-wall light quarks and static b\-quarks

**INSPIRE:** [842687](https://inspirehep.net/literature/842687)
**arXiv:** [1001\.2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.2023)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.82\.014505](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.014505)

**Authors:** Albertus, C\., Aoki, Y\., Boyle, P\.A\., Christ, N\.H\., Dumitrescu, T\.T\., Flynn, J\.M\., Ishikawa, T\., Izubuchi, T\., Loktik, O\., Sachrajda, C\.T\., Soni, A\., Van de Water, R\.S\., Wennekers, J\., Witzel, O\.

**Submitted:** 2010-01

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- Lattice

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 82 014505 \(2010\)

**Citations:** 61

## Abstract

We demonstrate a method for calculating the neutral B\-meson decay constants and mixing matrix elements in unquenched lattice QCD with domain\-wall light quarks and static b\-quarks\. Our computation is performed on the "2\+1" flavor gauge configurations generated by the RBC and UKQCD Collaborations with a lattice spacing of a approx 0\.11 fm \(a\^\-1 \= 1\.729 GeV\) and a lattice spatial volume of approximately \(1\.8 fm\)\^3\. We simulate at three different light sea quark masses with pion masses down to approximately 430 MeV, and extrapolate to the physical quark masses using a phenomenologically\-motivated fit function based on next\-to\-leading order heavy\-light meson SU\(2\) chiral perturbation theory\. For the b\-quarks, we use an improved formulation of the Eichten\-Hill action with static link\-smearing to increase the signal\-to\-noise ratio\. We also improve the heavy\-light axial current used to compute the B\-meson decay constant to O\(alpha\_s p a\) using one\-loop lattice perturbation theory\. We present initial results for the SU\(3\)\-breaking ratios f\_\{B\_s\}/f\_\{B\_d\} and xi \= f\_\{B\_s\} sqrt\{B\_\{B\_s\}\}/f\_\{B\_d\} sqrt\{B\_\{B\_d\}\}, thereby demonstrating the viability of the method\. For the ratio of decay constants, we find f\_\{B\_s\}/f\_\{B\_d\} \= 1\.15\(12\) and for the ratio of mixing matrix elements, we find xi \= 1\.13\(12\), where in both cases the errors reflect the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties, including an estimate of the size of neglected O\(1/m\_b\) effects\.
