1. **Quarkonia and the pole mass**, A\. H\. Hoang, M\. C\. Smith, T\. Stelzer, and S\. Willenbrock, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **59** 114014 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9804227](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9804227) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.114014](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.114014)

2. **A Quark mass definition adequate for threshold problems**, M\. Beneke, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **434** 115–125 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9804241](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9804241) [doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00741-2](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00741-2)

3. **Heavy quark expansion in beauty and its decays**, Nikolai Uraltsev, *Proc\. Int\. Sch\. Phys\. Fermi* **137** 329–409 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9804275](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9804275) [doi:10.3254/978-1-61499-222-6-329](https://doi.org/10.3254/978-1-61499-222-6-329)

4. **The Selfenergy of massive lattice fermions**, Bartholomeus P\. G\. Mertens, Andreas S\. Kronfeld, and Aida X\. El\-Khadra, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **58** 034505 (1998) [arXiv:hep-lat/9712024](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9712024) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.034505](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.034505)

5. **More on ambiguities in the pole mass**, M\. Beneke, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **344** 341–347 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9408380](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9408380) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01505-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)01505-7)

6. **Heavy quark effective theory beyond perturbation theory: Renormalons, the pole mass and the residual mass term**, M\. Beneke, and Vladimir M\. Braun, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **426** 301–343 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9402364](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9402364) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90314-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)90314-X)

7. **The Pole mass of the heavy quark\. Perturbation theory and beyond**, Ikaros I\. Y\. Bigi, Mikhail A\. Shifman, N\. G\. Uraltsev, and A\. I\. Vainshtein, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **50** 2234–2246 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9402360](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9402360) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2234](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2234)

8. **Anathematizing the Guralnik\-Manohar bound for anti\-Lambda**, Ikaros I\. Y\. Bigi, and N\. G\. Uraltsev, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **321** 412–416 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9311337](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9311337) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90268-2](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)90268-2)

9. **Monopole condensate and monopole mass in U\(1\) lattice gauge theory**, L\. Polley, and U\. J\. Wiese, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **356** 629–654 (1991) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90380-G](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90380-G)

10. **Three Loop Relation of Quark \(Modified\) Ms and Pole Masses**, N\. Gray, David J\. Broadhurst, W\. Grafe, and K\. Schilcher, *Z\. Phys\. C* **48** 673–680 (1990) [doi:10.1007/BF01614703](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614703)

11. **The Pole Mass in Perturbative QCD**, R\. Tarrach, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **183** 384–396 (1981) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90140-1](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(81)90140-1)

12. **Physical Processes and the Infrared Problem in Gauge Theories**, Thomas Appelquist, and J\. Carazzone, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **120** 77–95 (1977) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90096-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(77)90096-7)

13. **Infrared Finiteness in Yang\-Mills Theories**, Thomas Appelquist, J\. Carazzone, H\. Kluberg\-Stern, and M\. Roth, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **36** 768 (1976) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.768](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.768)

14. **Singularities in the physical region**, S\. Coleman, and R\. E\. Norton, *Nuovo Cim\.* **38** 438–442 (1965) [doi:10.1007/BF02750472](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02750472)